The High-Res Screenshot Thread!

mnet674 · 4 Dec 2008 at 15:30

At least Crysis looks good when it's running like ****, that just looks abysmal :/

benjo · 4 Dec 2008 at 15:34

mnet674 said:
At least Crysis looks good when it's running like ****, that just looks abysmal :/

That looks good compared to most screenshots i've seen :/

Squark · 4 Dec 2008 at 15:43

mnet674 said:
At least Crysis looks good when it's running like ****, that just looks abysmal :/

How on earth did they get it running apparently so well on the consoles then? :confused:

snowdog · 4 Dec 2008 at 15:55

Squark said:
How on earth did they get it running apparently so well on the consoles then?

''so well''

Since when are the consoles versions running well ?
It runs only a tad worse than the console version ( where it runs with about 30 fps average on the ps3, 33 fps on the 360)...

I'm uploading a vid now on youtube to show how it looks in motion, but the vid is 99 mb so will take awhile to upload, will post it in the gta iv thread if anyone wants ?

LeJosh · 4 Dec 2008 at 16:40

I've never known gta games to be graphically "up there" tbh.

Sasso · 4 Dec 2008 at 16:48

LeJosh said:
I've never known gta games to be graphically "up there" tbh.

*thinks back to the days of playing GTA2*

Tummy · 4 Dec 2008 at 16:55

I think it looks much much better and much smoother on my xbox 360.

snowdog · 4 Dec 2008 at 17:50

Some more pics:

Even though blur is on, it still leaves a lot of jaggies sitting there looking ****

, but it's better than no blur imo.

Squark · 4 Dec 2008 at 17:58

GTA4 - can't say that it looks hugely better than the 360 version

snowdog · 4 Dec 2008 at 17:59

Squark said:
GTA4 - can't say that it looks hugely better than the 360 version

It's not maxed though and until they add AA I doubt it'll look that great in the near future...

Squark · 4 Dec 2008 at 18:03

snowdog said:
It's not maxed though and until they add AA I doubt it'll look that great in the near future...

I guess, it probably needs some driver fixes/patches too looking at the rather random results in the benchmark thread

Strife212 · 4 Dec 2008 at 18:06

snowdog said:
Indeed ! I have just tried FC myself again on all ultra high settings, and it looks a bit, a lot worse than I expected .
Is there any mod to up the draw distance? It looks terrible to me now.

Crysis

SkeeterUK · 4 Dec 2008 at 18:31

Rambo89 · 4 Dec 2008 at 18:55

snowdog · 4 Dec 2008 at 18:56

u got AA working somehow ? The edges seem much smoother of the cars etc than in my game.

Sasso · 4 Dec 2008 at 18:59

snowdog said:
u got AA working somehow ? The edges seem much smoother of the cars etc than in my game.

get on nvidia control panal and force everything on... see if it makes it look smexier

Rambo89 · 4 Dec 2008 at 18:59

snowdog said:
u got AA working somehow ? The edges seem much smoother of the cars etc than in my game.

Screenshots are resized from 1920 x 1200, i always find higher resolution the less AA is needed, i have Render quality at Very high though, apparently that's the setting for AA in GTA.

Frapple · 4 Dec 2008 at 19:05

POW! Right in the kisser

snowdog · 4 Dec 2008 at 19:21

Sasso said:
get on nvidia control panal and force everything on... see if it makes it look smexier

Doesn't work in gta iv.

Rambo89 said:
Screenshots are resized from 1920 x 1200, i always find higher resolution the less AA is needed, i have Render quality at Very high though, apparently that's the setting for AA in GTA.

ah okay

. Indeed if resized then it makes sence.

No render Q very high just means a lot of AF

.

Dup · 4 Dec 2008 at 20:35

snowdog said:
Doesn't work in gta iv.

ah okay . Indeed if resized then it makes sence.

No render Q very high just means a lot of AF .

It can only do 2x AA, anything past that won't work I think.