I would say that the millions of subscribers to only fans would disagree.
The Huw Edwards situation
- Thread starter Participant
- Start date
- Status
I would say that the millions of subscribers to only fans would disagree.
It's about creating a negative image in your head,o generate outrage and drive more views. It's the same as folks in this thread labelling 16 year olds as young girls.
Caporegime
I always laugh when a teenager is violent and ita reported by the media, they're a youth. When they're a victim they're a child.
The commercialised ‘subscription’ nature of OnlyFans is not the same as paying an individual money (THAT much money) in a private arrangement.
But separately, I also find OnlyFans very odd.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 29,526
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 30 Sep 2005
- Posts
- 16,714
Twitter really is a cesspit. There is a certain persons name flying around, with pics. I'm sure you have all seen them by now (the one with his trousers round his ankles).
If it turns out to be a fake, damn! The comments are unreal.
How long until the BBC mafias control of central government weakens?
If it turns out to be a fake, damn! The comments are unreal.
How long until the BBC mafias control of central government weakens?
Last edited:
Soldato
Last edited:
If incorrect then yes, awful, but all the signs and behaviour patterns are strongly pointing to this individual.
Soldato
I did say before though, that its quite possible the "child" claimed to be 18 and hence inferred it was legal.
Its odd, we have some fixation that the moment everyone turns 18 they change from a child who cannot be held accountable for their actions to a fully fledged adult who must be.
Associate
over the years various presenters dissapear for all disgusting reasons. This one is no exception
we are accusing the most obvious people in tv
but why has no one noticed the sudden dissapearence of noddy?
why was he inviting children in to his car?
we are accusing the most obvious people in tv
but why has no one noticed the sudden dissapearence of noddy?
why was he inviting children in to his car?
Last edited:
Soldato
Could it be a case of "pay me £35K or I go to the press", still all pretty dodgy but maybe a bit more blackmail-ish
Caporegime
It is strange. I understand why we do it as there has to be a line in the sand but there will be 14 year olds more mature than some 20 year olds and we have very strong but entirely arbitrary views on these things that other countries don't have.
I'm not condoning any of this but it feels like some of the outrage is faux when the person is 16 or 17. Most normal kids are sexually active at that age.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 29,526
I'm sure I just heard a pundit on BBC Radio 5 saying "We need to get to the bottom of this"
Intentional, surely?
Intentional, surely?
Why has this come out without a name?
I don't really pay attention to news stories like this, but seems like releasing news without a name just causes all sorts of serious issues for people who are innocent but fall into the "possible candidate" remit
I don't really pay attention to news stories like this, but seems like releasing news without a name just causes all sorts of serious issues for people who are innocent but fall into the "possible candidate" remit
There has to be a line.
16 actually seems a bit young. 18 is much safer bet for legal.
I'm not sure of the nuances around the 16-18yo...it's never come up!
Has anyone ever been done for being 17 with a 15 yo for example? Vs a 70 with an 18yo.
Because the woman's parents want to blame someone other than themselves for their poor parenting.
What age was she when the 'pics' were bought?
How did the person come to the point of offering cash?
Was she on some Only fans type platform?
Was she coerced?
She was 17 right?
Obviously very stupid for a public figure to do this. But I don't think it's anywhere near as bad as some of the extreme noncing that's gone on in the BBC.
Its illegal, sure, it's stupid, sure. But there are a lot of scenarios where the person could have even believed she was 18+.
Unless he knew she was 17.
Last edited:
The parents / young woman haven't actually said.
They started talking when they were 17 AND the BBC presenter has paid £35k over the last few years for pictures however they haven't explicitly stated that the presenter paid for nude photos when they were under 18.
I don't think any of this should have come out without the investigation complete, concrete etc.
17 is fine for a relationship. Paying for pics is over 18? It's definitely not a guaranteed "your life should be ruined" case. Which it obviously will be. Especially with the hype this has created.
Just like the nicola river thing. It's gotten out of hand online
Soldato
Is it even confirmed its a girl yet?
From what I can tell there are no pertinent facts at all about the "victim".
Although I haven't fully caught up today.
- Status