This is the thing, the maths are off now because of interest rates but up to the pandemic the government could have literally bought, not built a home for everyone on housing benefit paid off the cost in less than 15 years and the savings would be enough to drop the basic rate of income tax 2p at the end of it.Government policy feeds landlords. They're an enormous voting bloc of about 4 million, more commonly living in battleground constituencies than the average.
Without such a huge group whose wealth is so very tied to house price rises, we might perhaps be able to actually have more council houses as policy.
It's all part of the same rotted ecosystem which landlords are a major, stinking part of.
If you're paying off a mortgage that cash is profit. Sure. You might not be able to access it now, but you can later.
That's not correct: you have to allow for Capital Gains Tax when you sell, maintenance costs, agency fees, and much, much more. And if you're a private landlord you get taxed on your rental income before paying the mortgage. And your asset - the property - is not readily fungible: it can take a long time to sell.
Of course it is, son
But when private landlords buy up approaching 10% of the entire country's housing stock in a decade, I'm sure you'll agree that you would expect that to put an upward pressure on prices, right?
you do you, it's not illegal, just don't complain about how people view you.i would be ok with that too..... but that isnt the world we live in..... no one forced the goverment to sell all its assets and not build replacments.... they did that all on their own. Someone is going to rent out and i would rather it be individuals rather than a small number of rich people being even richer......
and before you say i should take a moral stance and give up my wifes flat and us lose a bundle on it (it wasnt bought as a rental it was her home).. i hope you also have the same more fibre and have made sure that none of your pension or savings money is invested in the property market.... because if it is that would make anyone saying that a total hypocrite.
A lot of private landlords are simply landlords because they move out of a property, or a relative dies & they can't sell it without giving it away.
I'm stuck with a house I can't offload (wifes from before we met), nobody wants to buy it but stick it on FB marketplace for rent & people are falling over each other for a go at it. We tried to sell several years ago, it was up for 3 months, not a sausage. Put it on FB marketplace & within 24 hours we'd got 5 people wanting to look, it was occupied within a week. The problem is, for the reasons previously mentioned, the people that actually want it can't get a deposit yet they drive a 70 plate 3 series on finance, have two kids & a low paid job.
My niece is the same, moved out of a house & couldn't sell it so ended up renting it out, in this case to a family member.
Peak landlord brain: it would be terrible to let someone else buy an affordable house.A lot of private landlords are simply landlords because they move out of a property, or a relative dies & they can't sell it without giving it away.
Have you thought that maybe if you were getting no interest in selling it that you were asking too much money for it?
£60k is affordable, nobody wanted it, the person in there now prefers his 70 plate BMW to buying a house.Peak landlord brain: it would be terrible to let someone else buy an affordable house.
Renters don't suddenly become buyers, there is a shortage in both markets. My current tenants were living 4 people in one room when we moved to another country and rented out our family home.I don't quite understand this argument. Those houses wouldn't disappear. They would be owned by people.
You have 50 houses and 50 families that want those house. 25 are rented and 25 are owned. There is a 1:1 ratio of rented properties to people who want to rent.
You have 50 houses and 50 families that want those house. 15 are rented and 35 are owned. There is a 1:1 ratio of rented properties to people who want to rent.
I understand it isn't quite that simple but ultimately a house is a house and if a house goes from being rented to being owned and lived in by the owner then someone is removed from the rental market alongside the house.
The issue is fundamentally supply and demand and that supply and demand isn't nationwide. Its locational.
Hah wish I had had that option. Moved out in my early 20s (rent), moved back when my landlord sold the house, and then permanently in my mid-20s with my now wife. I always paid my parents rent whenever I lived there from the point I started working, and I'm talking hundreds a month, not pittance rate.No issue. But it's a huge leg up. The post said that they didn't have any hand outs.
Living with parents is a massive hand out
I agree, it's great. I wish my parents would have let me do it.
But the amount they wanted, and the limited jobs in the area meant I had to move.
Many people don't have that option.
We were asking for £30k below it's £90k value, should we just give it away?
Renters don't suddenly become buyers, there is a shortage in both markets. My current tenants were living 4 people in one room when we moved to another country and rented out our family home.
Well if no-one is prepared to pay £90k, has it occurred to you that it's not worth that much?We were asking for £30k below it's £90k value, should we just give it away?
Hah wish I had had that option. Moved out in my early 20s (rent), moved back when my landlord sold the house, and then permanently in my mid-20s with my now wife. I always paid my parents rent whenever I lived there from the point I started working, and I'm talking hundreds a month, not pittance rate.
It's doable, just not if you're spending everything on drink/cigarettes and the like.
We admittedly got lucky on a shared ownership, but it proves there are routes to do it, albeit rising rates/rent make it much harder to do now than 10 years ago.
Sounds like it's 60K.Well if no-one is prepared to pay £90k, has it occurred to you that it's not worth that much?
You've selectively quoted to prove a non point. My house if I sold it could absolutely not be bought by e.g. my renters. My house would most likely be bought by someone who already owns a house and my renters would then be homeless, or would have to go back to renting 1 room for a family of 4 instead of a 4 bed house.Of course they do. If a house changes from a rental property to someones home then somewhere, someone has changed from being a tenant to an owner in most cases. Its very oversimplified but ultimately it works out that way. Pointing at a tiny number of edge cases doesn't make it untrue.
Very, very few people are moving abroad and renting out their house in the grand scheme of UK housing.
We were asking for £30k below it's £90k value, should we just give it away?
I pointed this out on the Keir thread, Its crazy how so many people dont get it, there seems to be an assumption that the only issue that is people cant buy homes easily enough, solve that and then suddenly there is no rental crisis, when thats not the case at all.Landlords aren't ******** all over the market, it's government policy that is failing renter's and buyers alike causing the problems.
Without private landlords there would be less rental stock and so higher rents. Oh look, like exactly what is happening now.