The Malmstrom Air Force Base UFO/Missile Incident -Nuclear missiles shutdown

Teki187 said:
Not a meteorite then?
Click to expand...

ufoevidence.rog said:
At 7.00am on 30th June 1908 near the lower Tunguska River, Siberia, a large explosion occurred. The explosion was so massive that it caused damage 400 miles away, and was heard even further. Even the heat that came out from the explosion was felt hundreds of miles away.

For several nights all over northern Europe, the sky glowed enough to light the street of London. At first it was assumed that a massive meteorite had collided with the earth.

Given the remoteness of the area it was not until 1927 that an expedition was mounted to investigate the crash area. The expedition could not locate any bits of meteorite which puzzled them due the size that the meteorite would have to have been to create such a large explosion.

Another puzzle for the expedition was the way the tress were felled in an outward motion and that in the centre an area of trees were still standing, although all their bark and branches have been destroyed.

After the Second World War and the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, photos of the cities were compared with aerial photos of the Tunguska blast, and they were stunning similar.

As a result of this various scientists speculated that a nuclear explosion had taken place over the area, hence explaining the tree formation, and because no nation possessed nuclear device the logical conclusion was that it was from an exploding alien nuclear powered craft.

Other theories started to be banded around ranging from pinpoint black holes, and antimatter particles.

Many of the witnesses to the original crash spoke of seeing and oval-shaped mass moving across the sky, as well as seeing the object change course, and of having a very low speed.

Most people today believe that what hit Tunguska was simply a meteorite, but the alien craft theory still has a lot of credibility. As with most of these cases that occurred long ago, we shall probably never know for sure.
Click to expand...

http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc1719.htm
 
Given the remoteness of the area it was not until 1927 that an expedition was mounted to investigate the crash area. The expedition could not locate any bits of meteorite which puzzled them due the size that the meteorite would have to have been to create such a large explosion.
Click to expand...

But Magick, while they might not have found any bits of rock, they also didn't mention finding any large chunks of UFO, or for that matter an alien arm, leg or body. god knows what they were expecting to find 21 years after the event though. The rocks or lol, UFO pieces would have been covered up by topsoil by then.

Another puzzle for the expedition was the way the tress were felled in an outward motion and that in the centre an area of trees were still standing, although all their bark and branches have been destroyed.
Click to expand...

Puzzling? Some trees have better root structures, and stronger trunks. Puzzle solved.

After the Second World War and the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, photos of the cities were compared with aerial photos of the Tunguska blast, and they were stunning similar.
Click to expand...

You'll find that most meteor strikes tend to look like a massive explosion has occurred at their impact point. There's not a whole lot of confirmed evidence of what a UFO explosion actually looks like is there?

As a result of this various scientists speculated that a nuclear explosion had taken place over the area, hence explaining the tree formation, and because no nation possessed nuclear device the logical conclusion was that it was from an exploding alien nuclear powered craft.
Click to expand...

The logical conclusion is that a large chunk of rock hit the earth at a massive speed, given that we already know that a large chunk of rock hitting the earth at massive speed leaves a crater that looks like a nuclear explosion.

Other theories started to be banded around ranging from pinpoint black holes, and antimatter particles.
Click to expand...

Yeah. Bit pointless given that we know what it was no?

Many of the witnesses to the original crash spoke of seeing and oval-shaped mass moving across the sky, as well as seeing the object change course, and of having a very low speed.
Click to expand...

An oval shaped mass? Like a large ******* burning rock maybe? As for low speed....well you would only see it from far away thus making it look as if its moving slowly, because if you were near the thing when it hit, you'd be nothing but chunky jam. if they seen it chance course they were obviously drunk.
 
Last edited:
magick said:
http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc1719.htm
Click to expand...

What is a meteorite?

Its a big ROCK flying through space.

How would you be able to distinguish the difference between generic earth born rock and space rock? Unless it was Tiberium, it would be nearly impossible, so no wonder they didn't find anything. So after not finding a meteorite they instantly assume it was a UFO?

God talk about a massive leap.

Besides magick, you have yet to prove aliens exist, so how can we believe that a UFO shut down our nuclear missiles if you haven't proved aliens exist?
 
Teki187 said:
Besides magick, you have yet to prove aliens exist, so how can we believe that a UFO shut down our nuclear missiles if you haven't proved aliens exist?
Click to expand...

It's not my job to make you belive it's your decision to read the facts and make your own mind up.
 
magick said:
It's not my job to make you belive it's your decision to read the facts and make your own mind up.
Click to expand...

But the facts you have provided us are really poor.

In regards to lizard aliens, you showed us pictures of ancient pottery?

In regards to genuine UFO's you showed us statements by retired or military personal of little stature?

The cold reality and you know it as well, there is not a single shred of REAL facts to prove aliens exist and because of that fact, everything regarding aliens is fake.

Until we either get invaded, attack, contacted or shown a real life alien then anything regarding that fact is a lie.
 
Until you have done some good investigation into UFOs all opinions are moot to be honest.

There are only a handful of credible cases in a sea of rubbish, but these cases are credible and very hard to dismiss unless of course your relying on blind faith that such things could not possibly exist.

In my mind UFOs are not automatically associated to the idea of aliens, but I firmly believe there is a tangible phenomena out there.

I'm talking cases with documented radar recordings, trace marks on the ground etc.
 
MookJong said:
Until you have done some good investigation into UFOs all opinions are moot to be honest.

There are only a handful of credible cases in a sea of rubbish, but these cases are credible and very hard to dismiss unless of course your relying on blind faith that such things could not possibly exist.

In my mind UFOs are not automatically associated to the idea of aliens, but I firmly believe there is a tangible phenomena out there.
Click to expand...

What investigations can you do? There are no facts, no real evidence nothing.

There was a tombola shaped hat flying through the sky.....Either aliens have a real style problem or there fake?
 
that site is class;

http://www.ufoevidence.org/photographs/section/post2000/Photo398.htm

I am not sure exactly what this is.
Click to expand...

Well love, it looks exactly like a drop of rain on your camera lens.

---------------------------

http://www.ufoevidence.org/photographs/section/post2000/Photo325.htm

Snapped these pictures last night in Waupaca Wisconsin. Was hoping someone could tell me what type of aircraft this is.
Click to expand...

That "aircraft" would be a light and lens flare, coupled with your cack handed effort at holding the camera steady
 
Last edited:
I've seen two different UFO's that behaved like nothing I could relate to any known aircraft or phenomenon (hence "UFO"), but I wouldn't speculate as to what they were (hence "UFO").
 
What I want to know is why didn't the reptilians stop these aliens from disabling a nuke as they own all the nukes?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom