US: The Mandalorian

LOAM said:
This for me. Not withstanding that when you're working for a family focused channel you just don't even go down the "Nazi's didn't do all the bad things" route irrespective of how ambiguous your comments are.
Click to expand...

Alternatively you could try telling the truth about what she said, you know the bit where she said that the Nazi Government had turned the population against the Jews, making their neighbours hate them so much that they attacked them in street, which then gave the Nazi Government the remit to use the Nazi soldiers to round up Jews - you know the "Nazi's are bad" stuff she actually said rather than whatever rubbish you made up.
 
ianh said:
Alternatively you could try telling the truth about what she said, you know the bit where she said that the Nazi Government had turned the population against the Jews, making their neighbours hate them so much that they attacked them in street, which then gave the Nazi Government the remit to use the Nazi soldiers to round up Jews - you know the "Nazi's are bad" stuff she actually said rather than whatever rubbish you made up.
Click to expand...


Alternatively you could try telling the truth.

wAW7y1A.png

She quite clearly says "Jews were beaten in the streets, not by soldiers but by their neighbors....even by children" which may just be poorly written English but the key words are "not by", she's absolving Nazi soldiers of the described wrong doing, and blaming children.

I doubt she reads this forum though, she wont have sex with you for white knighting her.
 
Last edited:
LOAM said:
Alternatively you could try telling the truth.

wAW7y1A.png

She quite clearly says "Jews were beaten in the streets, not by soldiers but by their neighbors....even by children" Which may just be poor written English but the key words are "not by", shes absolving Nazi soldiers of the described wrong doing, and blaming children.
Click to expand...
You are likely correct in that it was more clumsy language than a major faux pas. I know when I first read what she'd said I got a sense there might have been much more going on behind the scenes. Maybe a culmination with other things they weren't happy about why she was given the chop but over this one statement, where her intent was more to highlight reasons NOT to give into hate, it seemed a bit harsh. Afterall if I paraphrase the green one, 'fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate and hate leads to suffering' - which is all she was really trying to say. ;)

Though from a calibre of the acting roster point of view it is a good decision; even Carl 'Action Jackson' Weathers was better.
 
MartinPrince said:
You are likely correct in that it was more clumsy language than a major faux pas. I know when I first read what she'd said I got a sense there might have been much more going on behind the scenes. Maybe a culmination with other things they weren't happy about why she was given the chop but over this one statement, where her intent was more to highlight reasons NOT to give into hate, it seemed a bit harsh. Afterall if I paraphrase the green one, 'fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate and hate leads to suffering' - which is all she was really trying to say. ;)

Though from a calibre of the acting roster point of view it is a good decision; even Carl 'Action Jackson' Weathers was better.
Click to expand...

Well my original post started with "notwithstanding", I don't really care what she said on twitter regardless of how stupid it was. I think you're probably right though, she presented them with an easy out.

The main point of my post was she's a terrible, wooden actor playing a role I personally couldn't see the sense of.

Tbh I'm more surprised that the people defending her post and "opinion" hadn't spent the last two seasons complaining about why the series needed a token strong female character and trying to get the word woke into their posts as often as they could.
 
Am I the only one which found Disney’s statement pretty odd? It was worded like she wasn’t even going to be in S3 anyway. I’d expect it to be well into pre production also already.
 
b0rn2sk8 said:
Am I the only one which found Disney’s statement pretty odd? It was worded like she wasn’t even going to be in S3 anyway. I’d expect it to be well into pre production also already.
Click to expand...

There's talk that Jon Favreau got involved that led led her apology message a few days ago. But she couldn't resist flapping her gums again so got **** canned. Supposedly they had been looking a reason to get rid of her from around November last year.
 
I'm sure she can sleep at night knowing she didn't bend the knee. All stated because she refused to put She/her in her bio like Pedro did who's brother is trans.

She's still refusing to lie down lol
 
MartinPrince said:
You are likely correct in that it was more clumsy language than a major faux pas.
Click to expand...

I am not sure. If she genuinely mixed up words why has she not apologised or corrected her statement.

she s actually tweeted or said something along the lines that never apologise...

she s not the sharpest tool in the box. She should not get herself involved in publicly displaying her political or whatever racial/gender leaning. She s not good at expressing herself and definitely not able to talk about issues other than just shout at people and telling her opinion and believe she is right and almighty.

whatever film she s now got herself into with that conservative channel, it will be horrendous to watch. But I suspect the hill billies will love it.
 
After her latest interview seems she lost her job well before that Holocaust tweet after refusing to sign an apology Disney wrote.

You guys seems to be attacking her but have you mentioned the online abuse, bulling she was received for not putting she/her in a bio before Beep boop boo.

Seems she has more nuts than most in here.

Misogyny could to mind :D
 
What's more important, putting your personal views on social media or keeping your career?

Whether a McDonalds worker or a Hollywood star - keep your personal views to yourself on social media. In this instance it just kept spiraling uncontrollably.
 
McPhee said:
Indeed.

Maybe she did vote for Trump. Maybe, in the days following the election (when she made reference to election fraud on Twitter) she believed fraud took place. So what? At the time, that idea hadn't been tested in court, and there were pundits across the American right entertaining the possibility. It's not as if she was posting telling people to storm the Capitol and overthrow the government.

Seems like all she's guilty of is potentially having dim political views and refusing to push gender politics. OMG - sack her!

It's almost as bad as the campaign to get Danielle Panabaker sacked from The Flash for "racism".
Click to expand...
100% with you on this.
 
MissChief said:
Could we get back to talking about the show? Should she be recast? Removed and a new character introduced?
Click to expand...
Drop the character. I don't see the point in trying to rebuild that which can be replaced. The character was pretty 2 dimensional in my opinion. Maybe bring back the droid voiced by Richard Ayoade. Lots to work with there considering Mando's prejudice against droids and the fact it's still on the ship.
 
Sharkhouse said:
Drop the character. I don't see the point in trying to rebuild that which can be replaced. The character was pretty 2 dimensional in my opinion. Maybe bring back the droid voiced by Richard Ayoade. Lots to work with there considering Mando's prejudice against droids and the fact it's still on the ship.
Click to expand...

Agreed on the first point, they could just write her out easily as they left it at the end of S2.

You also may have missed a scene at the end of season two. ;)
 
Just watched both series over the Easter weekend , loved it .

Star Buck in Star Wars - had a massive crush on Kara Thrace in BSG and she returned in 4K Lycra on my brand new LG 65 CX. I almost did a sex wee :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom