The Mastodon social network information thread

There are some misconceptions here. Re: echo chambers, it's not like that. Your home instance/server is just 'pick where you want your account registered'. In the same way that you can have a GMail account, but still email everyone else, whether they're using Outlook, iCloud or whatever. It's to stop one entity controlling the platform, there's always someone else (or you!) who can be running an instance and letting people in without there being one overarching authoritarian controlling who can say what *cough* Elon *cough*.

It doesn't matter which instance you register with, really. That said, obviously if you join, say, a tech one you might find new interesting people to follow - but you can still follow anyone from anywhere anyway and see them in your feed. The site itself has a news feed made up of your followed accounts, then 'Local' and 'Federated'. Think of it like 'My friends/interests', 'My subreddits (or subforums)' and 'All'. It's more like the equivalent of signing in to social media, forums, web apps and such with your AppleID or Google account - you went to one place to get an ID but you can use it everywhere and ultimately it's all one Internet. Same thing on Mastodon.
 
I would argue that you haven't really absorbed his reasons for such. Maybe it would be clearer if you used the platform.
 
Last edited:
These will be even more of an echo chamber than Twitter, wholev servers dedicated to this or that bias.

Urgh no thanks.

Bring back irc, lol
 
Eight hours on and still no confirmation email. So the servers can't cope with demand and people will just not bother with it.
 
I would argue that you haven't really absorbed his reasons for such. Maybe it would be clearer if you used the platform.

His reasons are wrong, though. Pretty much inverted. "replying" to a post without quoting it is much more likely to facilitate speaking at your audience instead of with the person you're talking to. Without quoting, you're not speaking with anyone - you're speaking to an audience. Which makes it easier to speak at your audience. Neither inevitably "adds toxicity", but his approach makes it easier to do so.
 
Twitter has been steaming doodoo for years any way, and between ocuk, reddit, telegram and discord, I'm already over-saturated for social media xD
 
His reasons are wrong, though. Pretty much inverted. "replying" to a post without quoting it is much more likely to facilitate speaking at your audience instead of with the person you're talking to. Without quoting, you're not speaking with anyone - you're speaking to an audience. Which makes it easier to speak at your audience. Neither inevitably "adds toxicity", but his approach makes it easier to do so.

9 times out of 10 when I see people banging on about toxicity they aren't talking about real toxicity, which there isn't a shortage of on the internet either. More often it is people who can't deal with their reality being questioned.
 
UK server is back up. Registered straight away with no issues. Now to see if there's anyone I actually follow on Twitter/etc on here...
 
His reasons are wrong, though. Pretty much inverted. "replying" to a post without quoting it is much more likely to facilitate speaking at your audience

It doesn't work like that on Mastodon, it's not like Twitter. When you reply to the person concerned, only that person is able to see the reply, it's not broadcast to everyone. This is to discourage other people chipping in with their twopence worth and starting arguments as so often happens on places like Twitter and OCUK.

One could say, "well, that also means that one is potentially missing out on new information or advice", but clearly they deem that to be the minoritative case, and are willing to dam that flow or redirect it towards 1:1 discussions.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom