The "New Gear/Willy Waving" thread

Cheers. :)

Does the IS version offer sharper images than the non IS version?
The second one is sharper but the first one is still an amazing lens,I will be getting the first one soon as I have a sigma 70-200 2.8 (still produces superb images) and for what I shoot I don't need the is.
 
That's a good price for that lens,with all zoom lens there is always a bit of dust in there,if you looked closely you night see it but 99% of the time you wont.
The same one brand new on the Canon website is still £1360!

Thank you for your help so far. :)
 
What are you going to be shooting? If you're mainly going to be using a telephoto handheld, IS is a massive bonus.
Mainly my motorbike, I’d like some flyby photos too, also landscape photos and family pictures.

I want to get some photos of me and my dad riding past so we are in focus and the background is blurred but also get the image as sharp as possible. :)
 
Mainly my motorbike, I’d like some flyby photos too, also landscape photos and family pictures.

I want to get some photos of me and my dad riding past so we are in focus and the background is blurred but also get the image as sharp as possible. :)

The last one require a panning technique and lots of practice.
 
6db6cc38711a71ac80c757cd040cf42e.jpg


This was with the Canon 70-200 None IS Mark1 @ 2.8 with some post processing the image is downgraded due to the Jpeg conversion to show on here.

Very Hot day down the coast grass is burned printed on A2 premium lustre for a friend.
 
Last edited:
6db6cc38711a71ac80c757cd040cf42e.jpg


This was with the Canon 70-200 None IS Mark1 @ 2.8 with some post processing the image is downgraded due to the Jpeg conversion to show on here.

Very Hot day down the coast grass is burned printed on A2 premium lustre for a friend.
Nice depth of field but does my image seem sharper? Taken with the 18-55mm kit lens that came with the 1300d. Only resized for the forum, no post processing done.

ImD9ffg.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom