• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

**The New Official THIEF-Incorporating Bench mark Thread**

_Alatar_ said:
3eidHP2.png

Nvidia GTX Titan @ 1346/1925, 4770K @ 5.0Ghz

E: 1080P
Click to expand...

Before i do anything with this;

Min FPS

Kaap on a 4.8Ghz Haswell only got 61.3 FPS.
Greg on a 5Ghz Ivy got 60.5
On a 5Ghz Haswell you got 65..6

Your way ahead of both Greg and Kaap on Similar CPU cores, and;

Avr FPS;

Way ahead of Greg on a similar GPU.

At this point it doesn't look right to me.
 
Kaapstad said:
I went round on a single Titan @1175/1802 and scored 81.5 fps

_Alatar_ was using 1346/1925

If we just stick to the core speed to start with

81.5 / 1175 = 0.0694 x 1346 = 93.361 fps

If you then factor in the higher memory speed _Alatar_ was using and the slightly more efficient Haswell 4770k that will bring the score up to what he got - 95.8 fps.
Click to expand...

Did you actually get 93.361 fps or are you just adding up?

15% higher clock = 15% higher score does not add up to me, clock scaling is never that linear.

Your 81 FPS @ 1175 on your Titan is the same as Tommy on his 290X @ 1175, and yet Avenged7Fold only got 86 @ 1300Mhz also on a 290X and a faster Haswell CPU. while Greg only got 84 on his 1300Mhz Titan.

So 100% clock to score scaling doesn't happen, it never does.

All those add up. Alatar's does not, not even close.

His FPS in all 3 aspects are way higher than anyone, in double digests, it should be marginal if anything.

Its just not making sense to me.

Rusty0611 said:
It's a game benchmark. It's a bit of fun not a competition.

The simple answer is they were ran on different drivers and different set-ups. Because of that no comparison can be made. Alatar got what he did and the others got what they did. That's why these threads exist to compare what different users are getting on different PCs. I really fail to see the problem.

Unless you sit there and debug the drivers he's using and the game the answer you seek cannot be found. :)
Click to expand...

I can't just add anything, if its not right. its not fair on others.
 
Last edited:
@ Matt, i did see that 99 FPS, it disappeared and was replaced with the one we are now debating right after you questioned it in the other thread.

@ Kaap, could re-post your results without this debate in them please? i'm linking to the results page, i just want to keep it nice and clean :)

MjFrosty said:
I think the AMD crew need to pipe down a bit with the accusations and get their facts straight, speaking forthright. This is an UE3 engine game, everyone knows UE3 prefers Nvidia hardware, before you go anywhere. There are all sorts of factors to consider. CPU/BCLK / RAM speed/ Timings/GPU clocks and drivers on top of that. There is no need for the bitterness.
Click to expand...

MjFrosty said:
Seeing as Humbug didn't bother to move my old score over when the thread began as I requested (shocker :p).

1080P

4960 @ 4.7 (water)

780Ti SC ref (water) 1315/1965

oz2u.jpg
Click to expand...

Frosty, So far most of us have managed to keep a cool head, despite one or two running around pouring petrol trying to get this thread to blow up.
I would appreciate it if you could refrain from such remarks highlighted, or i completely ignore all your future posts.

Please re-post your results without those remarks so i can add them to the results. thanks :)

All others updated.
 
Last edited:
LtMatt said:
I've still not played it. Out of principal im waiting for them to implement crossfire in Mantle before i touch it. I know it will be ridiculous overkill for the actual game but im curious to see what difference it makes to the benchmark sequence. Looking forward to trying out the first implementation of TrueAudio though.
Click to expand...

TrueAudio is good, it works well, but i have to say i find some of the reverberation effects a little odd, too much echo.
 
LtMatt said:
That is most odd. I will have to see if overclocking gets me any sort of decent gain. At stock i get this.

7CQsH09.jpg

I've scored slightly higher than this at stock but im having some issues at the moment with the benchmark sequence freezing so ive not got round to testing an overclock. The gain for me is huge though.

How are you taking screen caps?
Click to expand...

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom