Could you rephrase the question?
Don't think many would call it dodgy, but each to their own. Perfect and utterly realistic, no.
Don't think many would call it dodgy, but each to their own. Perfect and utterly realistic, no.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
**The NEW Tomb Raider Benchmark Thread**
- Thread starter Uncle Petey
- Start date
- Status
Updated. Nice score 
Kinda miss your uber clocking 7970's, but onwards and upwards eh?
Kinda miss your uber clocking 7970's, but onwards and upwards eh?
Just couldn't let go eh? That's pretty cool.
I guess you've got a board with pcie lane on/off switching?
That's pretty cool.I guess you've got a board with pcie lane on/off switching?
Compared to the standard hair modelling in this game (check any scene with other characters in it), it's excellent.
If you're finding it impacts performance too much for you, then I guess you can just turn it off seeing as it doesn't look very good to you anyway.
If you're finding it impacts performance too much for you, then I guess you can just turn it off seeing as it doesn't look very good to you anyway.
Oh, so you can tell us all about how you think it looks 'dodgy/iffy' but I can't say that I think it looks pretty good because it's not what you're asking? Ok then...
Why does it kill fps so much? I don't know, perhaps you should ask AMD and get them to explain the tech in detail?
Why does it kill fps so much? I don't know, perhaps you should ask AMD and get them to explain the tech in detail?
Don't turn this into something it isn't. My knickers remain untwisted fyi.
Offended over Lara's hair? Oh dear...
Offended over Lara's hair? Oh dear...
Last edited:
It's only featured in this game so far, so it's all we have to go on.
I believe they're working on TressFX 2, which may be less resource heavy due to the way they can lower detail at distance instead of rendering individual strands amongst other things. It might also allow more than one onscreen character to have fancy hair too.
Have you tried looking for information on it? When I said perhaps you should ask AMD for info, I wasn't taking the ****. Who better to answer your question than those who made it?
I believe they're working on TressFX 2, which may be less resource heavy due to the way they can lower detail at distance instead of rendering individual strands amongst other things. It might also allow more than one onscreen character to have fancy hair too.
Have you tried looking for information on it? When I said perhaps you should ask AMD for info, I wasn't taking the ****. Who better to answer your question than those who made it?
Fair enough
I'm sure there have been a few threads/posts with info about it. God knows where though.
I look at it a bit like physx giving an fps hit when enabled. To the same/similar degree? I dunno
Hopefully, it'll give less of a hit in the next iteration. Being open to all vendors will also hopefully see it in more future titles too, with more applications than just hair.
I'm sure there have been a few threads/posts with info about it. God knows where though.
I look at it a bit like physx giving an fps hit when enabled. To the same/similar degree? I dunno
Hopefully, it'll give less of a hit in the next iteration. Being open to all vendors will also hopefully see it in more future titles too, with more applications than just hair.
Oh dear, looks like I missed a few... Sorry about that, will add you all shortly
2600K @4.8
290 @1275/1625
1080p
14.9
290 @1275/1625
1080p
14.9
Updated.
Sure. Sorry, I haven't been about much today and I often miss posts in here tbh.
Managed to eke out a tad more too
2600K @5Ghz
290 @1285/1625
14.9
1080p
Managed to eke out a tad more too
2600K @5Ghz
290 @1285/1625
14.9
1080p
Sign up to imgur.
Run the benchmark and take a screenshot of your score by pressing F12.
When you exit the game, you'll see a box pop up with your screenshots. Press 'show on disk'.
Now drag that pic into the imgur window and let it upload.
Click the pic when it's uploaded and copy the 'bb code' link and paste it into a post you make here (use spoiler tags here please).
Last edited:
They're on water.
I guess your cpu @4.6 is roughly the same or very close to mine @5.0, but I'd still have thought the GPU clock difference would add up to more than 0.4fps though
Have you got any room for more on the core?
Can't get my vram higher than 1625 sadly, though I've only bothered to try 1650 really. Not sure it makes any real difference tbh.
I guess your cpu @4.6 is roughly the same or very close to mine @5.0, but I'd still have thought the GPU clock difference would add up to more than 0.4fps though
Have you got any room for more on the core?
Can't get my vram higher than 1625 sadly, though I've only bothered to try 1650 really. Not sure it makes any real difference tbh.
1285 is my limit unless I fart about with flashing bios' etc. Not my style though, so that's me done here
Well done, chaps. Updated.
I'm afraid my card is all eked out...
I'm afraid my card is all eked out...
Updated.
Couldn't resist temptation eh?
Couldn't resist temptation eh?
Is that all you got?
What kind of VRAM usage are you seeing in this now? What usage with 4xSSAA/High shadows too for that matter?
I'll pray to the silicon gods for you anyway
I'll pray to the silicon gods for you anyway
- Status