• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

***The Official 6320/6420 Overclocking Thread***

Finally some interesting results.

All we need now is a money shot of 8hrs prime :p

It is possible to take a screenie when running orthos and upload.

If your pc is stable it will do it.
 
snazzy_dazzy said:
:o My bad. Mis read I thought you wanted Prime :o . Orthos is running.

Will post pics tomorrow. Is running atm...


P.s I know it is on slack timings. Didnt spend much time.

It was still on stock voltage. I have got it up to 1300mhz on stock voltage but only on 2T. Is this significantly worse than 1T?


You can still use your pc when running orthos.I do it all the time.
If its stable your pc will work.

At least enough for a screenie.

We all post screenies of orthos actaully running anyway to show load temps etc...

Orthos please thanks.
 
snazzy_dazzy said:
Update. My CPU temp has gone up on Orthos. :( It is now 44oc :o Still safe I presume?

I just dont want to go to bed to wake up to find a broken chip. :(


p.s My quickest time on Superpi atm is 13.01 secs :)


Your temps are wrong BTW.

TAT doesn't work on a the 680 mobos IIRC
Core temp is wrong also.


Try speedfan
 
Core temp was showing your cpu as a 6500 and temps way off tat.

Speedfan was showing the same?

failed clock at 3.7ghz

Oh well back to the drawing board.

what cooling you using?
Those temps seem very low...
 
Its 3.6ghz I'm interested in TBH.
If it failed orthos on small FFT its the chip.And your settings...


3.4ghz is relatively easy to achieve...Its the last few 100 mhz and the vcore needed for these clocks I'm interested in.

I'm under water and phase so am interested in how they scale..
 
Last edited:
snazzy_dazzy said:
tbh i havent tried yet :o

What Vcore are you priming at for 3.7ghz? I can run 3dmark06 @ 1.5v @3.7ghz but havent tried stability yet.

Yes you have a few posts ago you failed prime @ 3.7ghz and stated you were not interested in trying.

You have not posted one screenshot of your overclock either.

Unlike scoobie dave that clearly shows his chip orthos stable @ 3.6ghz.
You then have the gaul to have your sig at 3.7ghz until I pulled you about it.As it was not stable.


I want a screenshot of this please.You have posted to many claims and no proof.


You also claim that you put 1.6v through it on air too.

Which I just do not believe.


Also you are so clearly spammings its pathetic.

You post 3 times in a row when all you need to do is edit your previous post.


For example:

post 175 6th May 2007, 16:09
post 1766th May 2007, 16:11
post 177 6th May 2007, 16:12

with no replies from anyone in between.So you were effectively talking to yourself.


Blatent spamming
 
Last edited:
WJA96 said:
I don't think he is a spoofer - I've seen several screenshots in memory threads that show his CPU running at 3.7GHz and the RAM at 1300MHz, so the board/RAM/CPU combination definitely does do 3.7GHz, and I've never seen him claim it as Orthos stable.

He says in this very thread it ran 10hrs.....lol

I know that some people on these forums require all sorts of evidence that an overclock is 'stable' but just as many people are quite happy with something that doesn't crash in normal use and I think that snazzy_dazzy's overclock is in that group.

Not interested TBH in unstable clocks

There is a pretty fine line between asking someone to make good on their claims and jumping all over them as if they were a spoofer. And as for posting several times in a row, I've just posted 4 seperate posts in the ASUS P5N-E SLi thread because evey time I posted, someone else posted something above it. It's easier to make a new post and once you're approaching a 7000 post-count, you're a bit less worried about being called a spammer :D

The posts have no relevance other than is increased post count.
Hes talking to himself and hes ruining a perfectly good thread.
 
ken1307 said:
nothing fancy here :p

6420@L652B216
3.4Ghz@425x8
1.464v underload

only need 1.368v for 3.2Ghz@400x8 though

347h1gb3.png


Nice clock and nice info ;)
 
bryanlaycock said:
im stuck at 3.3ghz, i tryed putting the pci-e to 105mhz and adding +0.1v to the pci-e and i can get 3.4ghz but its really unstable i posted near the top of this page with my other settings, can any give me any pointers what to change next to help the stability?

Your ram is probably holding you back.

What speed is it running?

I guess 950 mhz?

Try looser timings
 
Big.Wayne said:
Didn't see a results table yet?


How many 3.3's and 3.4's do we need.

In realtiy do we need a table of 1000 people running C2D @ 3ghz?

I'll gladly do a C2D with clocks that are above 3.4ghz as it would be interesting comparing vcores etc and cooling.

But 3.2ghz is a gimme on air with ok hardware and very easy to achieve.Even for a novice that uses the search function.
 
Big.Wayne said:
Cmon be a friendly chap and help the nOObies by sifting through this thread and creating a top ten, give preference to those people who made an effort to post an Orthos Stable screenie. I'm sure a lot of people would really appreciate your efforts! :D

In the future please don't bother making an *** Official thread*** unless you bought the hardware, yes its a good idea to help keep the forums tidy but just let another keen overclocker have a go for a change ;)


So your problem is with my *** Official threads*** ?

Wayne I suggest you get a life mate. :p

How can there be a top ten?
when a couple try for 3.6ghz and the rest settle for 3.2 or 3.4ghz?


Thats the problem here...there is to much talk of overclocking and little proof going on.


Scoobie Dave and a few others do it but even then no one is maxing them out.

I have yet to see a 6420 @ 3.8ghz orthos stable but i'll put my faith in scoobie dave at least he will have a go.
 
MisterT said:
LOL o dear, embarrassing? its a hobby not my life. Like 8 hours of orthos is required to prove stability? If i can encode a movie, have crap loads of stuff open and play CSS at the same time its stable enough for me and any 1 else. If its you just not believing it, then whatever.

+ note its a e6320/e6420 OVERCLOCKING thread, wheres the MUST BE ORTHOS 8 HOURS in that? just sharing the OCin experiance, so you dont need to act cocky with every none orthos screeny saying it means nothing. Peace.

but yeah ok back to the OCin talk


Right Just for the record Its a common even playing field in here that if you overclock and wish to share your results you post a stability shot.

3-6.jpg



Something like that. My 6400 @ 3.8ghz with proof after some people on here had doubts about the clock.

I was pleased to oblige and show them my 24/7 clock.

I have seen this countless times before with people saying that their clocks are 100% Stable and when asked for proof will dodge the reality of what clocking is about.

A clock is failed clock if stabilty testing is not shown.

Gaming stable and "oh I can encode a movie" Just don't cut it.

I could Boot my PC and do a super Pi @ 4ghz with my 6400 but stabilty at this speed was a NO NO under water.

Gaming stable and having loads of stuff running does NOT mean a successful clock In my eyes and hundreds of other OCUK forum members.
 
MisterT said:
so with your unseen back up from easyrider and 'other members' id say the majority dont give a damn lol


Thats where you are wrong...

I'm not impressed with your 3.8ghz super PI clock.

It means nothing to me.And without a stabilty test how can I make a valid judgement on what steppings are good clockers and will achieve 3.8ghz stable?
 
Last edited:
MisterT said:
m8 , i said before , i just threw in a shot of the clock that included a pi shot cuz i did it for my other forum, which was a S.Pi challenge. Wasnt proof of stabilty just sharing my achievable clock, lets not go round in circles now.

do you know what board easyrider uses m8? im looking for a change, maybe a p35.... no hard feelings btw m8 , just a difference in opinion really aint it :)

+ kingo have you tried a big step over 3.4? mine wouldnt go 1 mhz above 3.6 which had me puzzled but works fine again at 3.62+, may be a dead area of clock? just a thought


My clock was on a DQ6 (have an Abit P35 pro on Order)

Certain mobo's have FSB holes...One of the reasons I ditched my 680i
 
Back
Top Bottom