Stacking
Why are 30 x 10sec identical exposures better than a single 10sec exposure, surely they produce the same image? How does stacking identical images make objects brighter/clearer/show deep sky objects?
A couple of reasons:
* dynamic range - the astro objects have a larger dynamic range than daytime so sometimes it's even need to take a set of 3, 10, 30, .., 1800 second images.. then pull them together as HDR in processing. Often a picture is taken to purposely target the faint detail, so saturation occurs in the stronger parts - post processing (this is another art entirely from daylight processing) then is used to mask out the saturated with HDR or layers.
* the main reason is the image signal - i.e. what you're taking a photo of is very dim, so the signal (the object light) is in danger of being drowned out by the noise from the camera etc. So taking multiple images (including 'darks' and 'flats' as well) allows the signal to be identified and the noise to be removed/reduced.
If the tracker ( Skywatcher star adventurer is more my budget for now) allows longer exposures - i.e over 30 secs - is it not beneficial to shoot for longer periods of time at f1.4 @ 100 ISO?
Daytime cameras are pre-amp hot hence they run the sensor signal preamplifier all the time for fast daylight shooting. So for night time this becomes a bit of a balancing act for a DSLR. (the amp causes amp glow noise in the picture)
You can shoot as long as you want within limits of the tracking and the well depth of the sensor (see the point about dynamic range).
I've taken 20 minute subs before - a 'fast' lens (i.e. low f-number) will do well it will be wide angle so you're limited to large objects like nebula and the milky way for smaller lenses.
A 300mm lens is a good point and Cannon lenses are great for astro work (also Cannon cameras can be control better than other makes via a software package called APT, or others).
Deep Sky Objects
Now this is the kind of thing I'm talking about! Getting images like these would make me get out into the countryside and sit in the dark for a couple of hours! By the looks of Astrobin, its possible with a DSLR and a lens <300mm. I've read a few guides about the post processing, deepskystacker, photoshop etc, but would my 5DIII + 24-70/70-200, tripod, lp filter & Skywatcher tracker be everything I needed to start?
You can start with a simple tripod and a timer release for the shutter. In fact I would recommend this before going out and getting lots of kit. A couple of nights of experience will give you a starting point.
Have a large storage card for the image and a battery pack as the camera battery may have issues in the cold (Li-ion for laptops have issues for example).
Adding a scope
What advantages are there by adding a scope for photography purposes? I've read you can just buy attachments to add the camer to the bottom of scope. However, from some of the images I've seen on astrobin -
http://www.astrobin.com/32154/ &
http://www.astrobin.com/23830/, how much would a scope improve these images? Is it just a case of getting a lot closer and therefore more detail? Are those images heavily cropped?
Now you're not going to like me
Camera lenses have aberration that results in a non-flat field when wide open. Also the spot size off axis tends to be more noticeable in astro/night shots. Flats help correct any vignetting but not the spot size..
This is my 670mm f6.38 being used visually:
![](https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5602/15647566887_eb834a90a5_c.jpg)
Sorry for my lack of understanding, particularly with the stacking part, but I just can't seem to get my head around the benefits.
Here's a night shot using a Cannon D650 with the standard EF 18-50mm lenses.. using stacking - look at the noise level.
[url=https://flic.kr/p/fCwF9b]
Plaza at night
An another using multiple duration exposures with HDR using my 670mm and 383L camera:
HDR
An this is a lunar shot, again using the 670mm:
SGL8-moon-stacked-sharpened-stretched
The above shot is saturated because the 383L camera can't take shots under about 3 seconds..