*** The Official Battlefield 5 thread***

Troezar said:
No one really cares about women being in it or disabilities. There is however an agenda being pushed by corporates because it looks good to say they're inclusive.

In the same way the media will discuss an issue where 99% can be in favour but they also present an opposing view as if the issue were a 50:50 split. Most views should get an airing (maybe not some of the extremes) but they need to have context.

I've seen how the press can misrepresent people first hand

Tl;dr there are large public and private concerns who do have agendas and will distort the truth for political or financial gain. The young are always the prime target, religions and politicians know this!


It isn't just a game it is also a tool to change opinions and influence others. You seem to have the awareness to realise this but many don't. EA should stick to making fun games and leave the politics out of it.
Click to expand...


break it down for you. social media is the big sell now. last game had a coloured guy on it.this time year of the women.they got a women on it.they do it on purpose.its bait.social media went crazy about it because most people are stupid.look at all the womens rights this that and the other in the media over the last year.that is why a women is on the front.

the game they have obviously took a look at what is current and being played.they invited pubg cerator at the early stages.i knew instantly what was being planned.he wasnt there for breakfast or iced buns.theyve created what they think will be a merge between the BR games and battlefield. for me personally i think its a stupid move. many who want battlefield want eg that.we have BR games that suit our needs.if you want a change or your slice of battlefield you want exactly that ! not battlefield BR.

this will end up like hardline.popular for 1/2 months then dead.
 
~>Dg<~ said:
this will end up like hardline.popular for 1/2 months then dead.
Click to expand...


Ignoring the rest of your randomly clumped together hard to read post, i'll just address this last part part. Yeah, doubt it.


How many years have you been using a pc but still for some reason can't post something that isn't irritating to read?
 
He either can't be bothered to write correctly, or he missed school the day they taught English. I'd like to know which it is, if it's the first one I can't be bothered to read his post's - if it's the second then I'll pitty him and struggle through.
 
~>Dg<~ said:
talks about my typing skillz to avoid game weaknesses. pubg is great. thats why bf5 is trying to emulate it.
Click to expand...


Your gibbering about game weakness was talking about a character model and the possibility of a battle royale mode. You totally ignored all the other info that has come out about the game that makes it much more interesting. I would have thought your "ea contacts" would have clued you in more, apparently not...
 
Gerard said:
Your gibbering about game weakness was talking about a character model and the possibility of a battle royale mode. You totally ignored all the other info that has come out about the game that makes it much more interesting. I would have thought your "ea contacts" would have clued you in more, apparently not...
Click to expand...

why even bait ? cant you just talk about the game why you like it or what you are looking forward to. like many weak minded people who just try to bait me. i proved to admins on here at the time. i even had a EA master account. i do know a few at EA Dice still but what as that got to do with anything ?

all ive said is i dont think that by changing the bf formula more towards a fornite / pubg experience it will make a great or better battlefield game.the exact opposite.

when you goto the shop for coca cola you dont want lemonade. i want a battlefield game.not a BR game. i have that already. many people will feel the same do feel the same.it wont be all but battlefield player numbers are already at a all time low across the platforms. 50,000 people total play bf1 . that is terrible.for such a big franchise.pubg has 1.5 million on right now upto 2.5 million on a sunday.that is why you are getting the BR style gameplay added.

what should be done is just keep the battlefield recipe just make it better get the bugs sorted and long time issues.you dont need to change your game to try and catch what could be a fad.

hardline tried this.was fun for a short period of time then dead.thats why i said bf5 will end the same.

if it doesnt im sure next year you can gloat about how you were right.
 
Well if I had a choice to make a game that appealed to 50k vs a game to appealed to million+ I think the choice is fairly obvious.

Surely the game designers are trying to appeal to as many people as possible, hence the inclusion of a woman.

Not sure why anyone would criticise a company for attempting to design a game that has a mass appeal.
 
~>Dg<~ said:
why even bait ? cant you just talk about the game why you like it or what you are looking forward to. like many weak minded people who just try to bait me. i proved to admins on here at the time. i even had a EA master account. i do know a few at EA Dice still but what as that got to do with anything ?
Click to expand...

Whatever you say!

~>Dg<~ said:
all ive said is i dont think that by changing the bf formula more towards a fornite / pubg experience it will make a great or better battlefield game.the exact opposite.

when you goto the shop for coca cola you dont want lemonade. i want a battlefield game.not a BR game. i have that already. many people will feel the same do feel the same.it wont be all but battlefield player numbers are already at a all time low across the platforms. 50,000 people total play bf1 . that is terrible.for such a big franchise.pubg has 1.5 million on right now upto 2.5 million on a sunday.that is why you are getting the BR style gameplay added.

what should be done is just keep the battlefield recipe just make it better get the bugs sorted and long time issues.you dont need to change your game to try and catch what could be a fad.

hardline tried this.was fun for a short period of time then dead.thats why i said bf5 will end the same.

if it doesnt im sure next year you can gloat about how you were right.
Click to expand...


Yes, how dare they add a new mode to the game to try and expand its player-base and have more appeal, how dare they add new features to a game. We would clearly much prefer the same generic stuff year in year out with no attempt of making the game have more depth.

Simple fact is conquest is the main mode of Battlefield and always has been, thats not going to change. If they do add a battle royale mode its just an addition to the game just like rush and operations were, the main "meat and potato's" mode will still be conquest.

All the features that have been talked about so far we don't even know if they will be applied to all modes or just specific ones. Fortification options suits a ww2 game as its quite obvious that kind of thing happened. Being able to tow aa\at guns behind vehicles also is something that was done, until we get more specific info directly from dice its up in the air what options apply to what game mode or if its a blanket change to all modes. So either get in touch with your super secret "ea insiders" and find out, or do what the rest of us will do and wait til they release more info.
 
aowc02 said:
who remembers the days of BadCompany 2 rushes?

those were absolutely brilliant
Click to expand...

You can still play those matches.

I don't like BR nor am i interested in it, but i believe in respect to Battlefield, it's never going to acquire the attention and player numbers that games like Fortnite and PUBG have, they're too well estabilshed and Battlefield is too late to get a decent amount of that action and people play Battlefield for Conquest primarily.
 
I couldn't care less about Battle Royale in any game, just a toxic #!@fest, full of screaming little kids 90% of the time.

I wouldn't want to see it in a Battlefield full stop, if they need to do it, then do a separate game that has nothing to do with Battlefield.
 
'Wes said:
You can still play those matches.

I don't like BR nor am i interested in it, but i believe in respect to Battlefield, it's never going to acquire the attention and player numbers that games like Fortnite and PUBG have, they're too well estabilshed and Battlefield is too late to get a decent amount of that action and people play Battlefield for Conquest primarily.
Click to expand...

aye but unfortunately battlefield game of old are riddled with cheaters - which isnt fun and not getting the active development it used to counter said cheaters
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom