I agree. It's disgraceful how the WBC protected Wilder and allowed him to threaten Whyte how he wouldn't give him a chance for 2 years.
Deluded?
Perhaps this card will jog your memory. Or perhaps we should revisit that night in December over the British Heavyweight title.
Is a TKO finish no longer a comprehensive finish? Sure, Whyte rocked AJ once during the 7 rounds but lets not pretend that he didn't beat Whyte.
Where is the risk vs reward for AJ? What has Whyte got to offer AJ? He has no belts, he's already lost to AJ and as you say, he
is a risky fight. It's a lose-lose for AJ as he has nothing to gain from beating Whyte again. Dillian put all of his eggs in the WBC basket. He stopped paying sanctioning fees for the other belts and he is no longer in the top 15 for either the IBF, WBA or WBO. So AJ
doesn't have to fight Whyte unless he feels like it for some reason. Whyte should've paid sanctioning fees for the other organisations and then he would've been able to force AJ via a mandatory and then he wouldn't have to worry about rematch terms.
And he rather chase the undisputed fight. Surely the undisputed fight is the one we all want to see? AJ has already beaten Whyte comfortably so there is no reason why he wouldn't do it again, especially if it was worthwhile. What Whyte should be doing is forcing the WBC to make Fury face the mandatory and if he gets a belt then the AJ fight gets that much bigger.
Right now you want to see Whyte face him because?..... I'd rather see AJ get rid of Pulev then fight Usyk and then a unification before he fights Whyte again.
Yeah he came back and won the immediate rematch, he made all the adjustments necessary and won the fight easily.
Imagine if people still held Fury accountable for that shady John Mcdermot win.
Or that time a small cruiserweight dropped him. I think smaller fighters like Povetkin, Hunter and Usyk give Fury problems. Maybe even Rivas cause cause a few problems. I don't think he'd lose to them but they'd make him think, much more than Wilder did for sure.