If you look at my post I said...
I don't think you'd find many people who consider Klitschko part of this generation of heavyweights when he last fought 5 years ago and only 2 fights in the last 7 years. Of the current active heavyweights from his own generation, Fury has only beaten 2 highly ranked fighters. If he wants to be out-and-out the best fighter of his generation, which he may well be, but he needs to prove it in the ring. A trilogy with Wilder, who for the longest people have said is a terrible champion, and one defence against Whyte is hardly compelling evidence to be the best of the generation. He, in my opinion, needs to fight Usyk, AJ, Ruiz, Hunter and Joyce. If he cleaned out the division and took on all comers then he'd have a rightful claim to 'best of his generation'. Remember, styles make fights and in the heavyweight division anything can happen. No fighter deserves to get credit for fights they haven't taken when fans say "oh that fight is pointless X would easily win". No. Prove it. Imagine if Mike Tyson didn't fight Buster Douglas? The greatest upset in boxing would've never happened cause you have fans saying they win easily anyway.
Just to repeat myself. 5 World title fights, 3 of which were against the same man, and 2 defences. That's all he has done. His best opponents are Wladmir, Wilder, Whyte and Chisora. Cunningham is a good name at cruiserweight but didn't do much at heavy and he arguably lost the first John McDermot fight.
He has to show more if he wants to go down as the king of the division who reigned over everyone.