Guys if you want those on the score board please add screenshots of your scores
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
*** The Official OCUK Cinebench R20 benchmark Thread ***
- Thread starter humbug
- Start date
Guys if you want those on the score board please add screenshots of your scores
I was talking about Multi Core, the one above my score is a 6950X. In terms of SC its only 6 points away between mine and the 8086K, we will see.The 8086K 540 @ 5.2Ghz? that's a limited edition 8700K, Intel's 40 year anniversary.
A 6950X in a 10 core 20 thread Broadwell-E, no one posted one of those, originally a £1600 CPU, before AMD launched the 1800X and made it irrelevant.
You would need to run your 3900X at 4.8Ghz to beat it, that looks like a big ask from Zen 2, shame. the IPC of Zen 2 is 10% higher than Coffeelake but 7nm just doesn't clock high enough, YET
Ah... +1% would give you 5,398, 15 point's higher than the 6950X, +1% on top of your 4.45Ghz is 4.945Ghz (4.5Ghz)
Are you asking me to set my PC on fire? Haha last time I forgot to put my fans on Performance or Full Speed when benching, I had them on a relatively quiet profile.
Moi? 
Score Update - Interestingly 4325 All Core scores EXACTLY the same (to the point) as 4400/4375/4325/4325 which indicates the overall performance is limited by the slowest CCX irrespective of how fast any of the others are set to?
3900X @ 4325Mhz All Core
Memory and Infinity Fabric increased to 1866Mhz (Kept on a 1:1 divider) with the same tighter timings of 1800.
Multi Core: 7835
Full Screenshot:
3900X @ 4325Mhz All Core
Memory and Infinity Fabric increased to 1866Mhz (Kept on a 1:1 divider) with the same tighter timings of 1800.
Multi Core: 7835
Full Screenshot:
Soldato
@Sin_Chase nice score My next step is to play with memory and see if I can crack 7900 points, running 3600C16 b.die so hopefully can get a bit out of it.
My next step is to play with memory and see if I can crack 7900 points, running 3600C16 b.die so hopefully can get a bit out of it.
Soldato
Nice
I want to see the difference between faster speed and tighter timings, and possibly both 
Deleted member 66701
D
Deleted member 66701
Score Update - Interestingly 4325 All Core scores EXACTLY the same (to the point) as 4400/4375/4325/4325 which indicates the overall performance is limited by the slowest CCX irrespective of how fast any of the others are set to?
3900X @ 4325Mhz All Core
Memory and Infinity Fabric increased to 1866Mhz (Kept on a 1:1 divider) with the same tighter timings of 1800.
Multi Core: 7835
Full Screenshot:
Nearly as fast as my 2950x with pbo on - that's mad! Really excited for the next threadripper release now!
Permabanned
Cinebench r20 is nowhere near full load Try ycruncher Pi that takes extra 35w over cinebench
Forgot about new popsts in this, i'm right in the middle of something but will update at some point today
Soldato
Cinebench r20 is nowhere near full load Try ycruncher Pi that takes extra 35w over cinebench
Regardless, its heavy load enough on the CPU as its a rendering test, however, thats not what that post was about, it was about do not let you CPU voltage exceed 1.325v under heavy load.
Nice stress tester by the way.....didnt know about that one, its really got things cooking here.
Last edited:
Its a heavy real world load on the CPU, power bug applications are not that, they are designed to stress the CPU way beyond design for no other reason than "oh but is it 12 hour Prime95 stable????????????"
No, its doesn't mater.
No, its doesn't mater.
Permabanned
For some it does. I still not olayed anything besides benchmarks and stress tests on my 3900x hahaha
Permabanned
O ye the 0 1 7 startup sequence will push infinity fabric cache and cores to limit. Its as good as good old intel burn test. If it goes for volts i set myself limit 1.35 as total max that goves max of 220w on max stress. My 2700x was running on 233w on max streaa so this one got is easyer
Soldato
My old 2600k never was prime stable, yet I never had a crash in all the years I had it
A stable system to me is one that doesn't crash in the things I use it for. If it's Battlefield stable it's good. Battlefield is good at finding a bad overclock.
Updated, sorry for the delay
