Nope is at 50. So looks in line for the single core stuff to other results. Multi just looks low, may have had stuff in background I suppose.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
*** The Official OCUK Cinebench R20 benchmark Thread ***
- Thread starter humbug
- Start date
Nope is at 50. So looks in line for the single core stuff to other results. Multi just looks low, may have had stuff in background I suppose.
Scoreboard Updated 
You're 3% off they others at the same speed.
Soldato
Associate
Why have you changed your cache and multi for the single core run, play fair now.
Soldato
Ran it on my workstation in the office which is an old hp z800 with twin xeon x5650's.
Soldato
Why have you changed your cache and multi for the single core run, play fair now.
Are we meant to keep the same?
got another screen at x55 just waiting till you post your next one 
Associate
Still using that ice cold water are we, lol. I can boot at 55 but that's about it.Are we meant to keep the same?
Soldato
Still using that ice cold water are we, lol. I can boot at 55 but that's about it.
Till tomorrow then it's going in the cupboard. Actually bought a case, not had one of those for about 5 years at least! Back to what i bought this PC for in the first place.
Associate
What case have you bought may I ask. ?
Soldato
A really old Dell Latitude E6320, cos why not Single core was painfully slow.
i5 2540M @ 2.6GHz (3.1Ghz boost during CB runs).
Multi: 565
Single: 237
Single core was painfully slow.i5 2540M @ 2.6GHz (3.1Ghz boost during CB runs).
Multi: 565
Single: 237
Soldato
Just got a phanteks evolve, will do the job. We be easier to carry into cinema room instead of lugging bucket pump etc!! Forza 4H looks great in 4K and 120"
Soldato
2700x run, DOCP & PBO enabled.
Associate
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2018
- Posts
- 895
2700x run, DOCP & PBO enabled.
Have HWINFO64 in the background while running the bench and you'll prolly see all cores of 4GHz for Current Clocks. Not 4.3GHz. For the MT run i mean.
Permabanned
My best with new C20.
8600K @ 5ghz , cache @ 4.9ghz, 3900mhz c16 mem.
8600K @ 5ghz , cache @ 4.9ghz, 3900mhz c16 mem.
Associate
i7-5820k @4.5ghz
Something a little different to help give people a broader idea... As there have been a fair few 8700Ks now, all overclocked between 5GHz and 5.2GHz, I ran C20 with only XMP and Asus MCE (Multi-Core Enhancement) turned on. So, 8700k @ 4.7GHz with 32GB 3600MHz cl16 RAM:
Surprisingly close behind given the 300MHz to 500MHz differential, especially with how much extra power it takes to run >5GHz vs 4.7GHz on the same setup. I might keep it.
Surprisingly close behind given the 300MHz to 500MHz differential, especially with how much extra power it takes to run >5GHz vs 4.7GHz on the same setup. I might keep it.
Soldato
8700K @ 5.1Ghz, 3200Mhz RAM
4002 Multicore
520 Single
4002 Multicore
520 Single
Edit one more ^^^
Updated
Updated
Edit one more ^^^
Updated
You typo'd mine as 3374 instead of 3774. It's low enough without you adding to (or subtracting from) it...
Bring on the Ryzen 9s!