Soldato
snip.
You still never answered what I asked. Now come on you've been moaning like hell.
snip.
I don't think we should have another vote.
If we have a decision of this magnitude made (either way) on a narrowly divided country, we leave about half the country disenfranchised.
Both camps were appalling at putting together a reasoned debate and the leave camp retracted what can only be called campaign LIES moments after the result.
A second referendum with some actual measured debate and some understanding of the genuine implications is what the country deserve, I believe if this happens something more decisive would come of it. If that was to be leave so be it.
I don't think we should have another vote.
Im not 100% sure but hasn't Cameron said he won't do this?
So why are you moaning about it all?
So why are you moaning about it all?
Embrace it and move forward
I'm struggling to see what all the fuss is about lets activate 50 and move forward
Well, I think people would have voted differently if they knew the below facts:
1. NHS is not going to get 350 million (which in the first place was an incorrect amount in the first place rather than fact).
2. The borders will not be closed to immigration.
3. We are definitely not going to get 'better trade deals'.
I am pretty sure even the 1st point by itself could easily swing 0.9% of the voters which was, all of the difference. It's not exactly 4% difference, it was 1.9% of people more who had voted to leave.
Also, with no disrespect to elder community, unfortunately the majority of whom voted to leave - they won't have to deal with all the crap and won't lose much.
I am not talking about 70/30 but a 58-60% minimum voting either way should be the quota before actually doing something like that. 0.9% more of population isn't a majority.
If we have a decision of this magnitude made (either way) on a narrowly divided country, we leave about half the country disenfranchised.
Both camps were appalling at putting together a reasoned debate and the leave camp retracted what can only be called campaign LIES moments after the result.
A second referendum with some actual measured debate and some understanding of the genuine implications is what the country deserve, I believe if this happens something more decisive would come of it. If that was to be leave so be it.
You still never answered what I asked. Now come on you've been moaning like hell.
You have 87 Posts in this Thread the vast majority of which are you belittling everyone who didn't vote the way you wanted them to.
https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/search.php?searchid=23961329
Childish and provocative eh? What an utter chump you are sir!
How do you add someone to ignore?
I agree. Cameron has done Britain and the world a huge disservice by abandoning his word and refusing to pull the trigger.
I belittle people who voted to leave for the wrong reasons. I have also said on a few occasions that if people voted that way for the right reasons, I don't bear any grudge against them.
It seems that the leavers are all being very short sighted and they have no argument at all aside from WE WON MOVE ON LOL... Sickening.
So you can ignore me?
Fair enough. In user CP.
I think we should embrace the idea of a petition to retrospectively change the result of things. Got this one ready just in case England lose at Euro 2016
"We the undersigned call upon HM Government to implement a rule that if England get fewer goals than the opposing team in Euro 2106 that the game is replayed"