Soldato
- Joined
- 17 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 3,080
- Location
- Swindon, UK
The trouble with CPU recommendations is all the other factors.
So yes, FSX is CPU megahertz hungry, but if you have multiple applications open along side, including web browsers, maps, utilities etc, then a multicore CPU will help with those other processes. However, FSX won't utilise the extra cores.
The Dash-8 took a different approach and number crunches outside the limitations of FSX. So it should not be jerky on a good PC. Even on my archaic PC, it runs well.
It's well worth taking a backup of your current fsx.cfg. Then start reducing your sliders and see what makes a difference without you noticing. Introduce the recommended tweaks gradually.
In GA flying, the ground scenery is important. If you're flying in-land, then water effects aren't so important. If you're flying 40,000 ft up, then airport traffic isn't important. So maybe think about different saved settings for different scenarios.
So yes, FSX is CPU megahertz hungry, but if you have multiple applications open along side, including web browsers, maps, utilities etc, then a multicore CPU will help with those other processes. However, FSX won't utilise the extra cores.
The Dash-8 took a different approach and number crunches outside the limitations of FSX. So it should not be jerky on a good PC. Even on my archaic PC, it runs well.
It's well worth taking a backup of your current fsx.cfg. Then start reducing your sliders and see what makes a difference without you noticing. Introduce the recommended tweaks gradually.
In GA flying, the ground scenery is important. If you're flying in-land, then water effects aren't so important. If you're flying 40,000 ft up, then airport traffic isn't important. So maybe think about different saved settings for different scenarios.