** The Official Space Flight Thread - The Space Station and Beyond **

mrk

mrk

Man of Honour
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
101,318
Location
South Coast
Lasers have been fired on Mars now, Curiosity lasers:

Mars rover Curiosity fired its laser for the first time on Mars, using the beam from a science instrument to interrogate a fist-size rock called "Coronation."

he mission's Chemistry and Camera instrument, or ChemCam, hit the fist-sized rock with 30 pulses of its laser during a 10-second period. Each pulse delivers more than a million watts of power for about five one-billionths of a second.

120819165256-large.jpg
 
Man of Honour
OP
Joined
9 Jan 2007
Posts
164,583
Location
Metropolis
Back to the space station with a super image:

676913mainiss032e016906.jpg



Canadarm2 and HTV-3

In the grasp of the International Space Station's robotic Canadarm2, the HTV-3 Exposed Pallet is moved for installation on the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) H-II Transfer Vehicle (HTV-3) currently docked to the space station. Earth's horizon and the blackness of space provide the backdrop for the scene.

More on the HTV-3 mission.
 
Soldato
Joined
26 May 2009
Posts
22,106
Isn't this like the 7th rover to land on Mars? (the 4th to work properly)

Edit:

Its a real shame that the USSR gave up on Mars rovers when they realised the USA didn't have the capability to compete, imagine how much we could have learned already :(
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
26 May 2009
Posts
22,106
Is the ISS something the UK are involved in? Some sites say we are some say we aren't.

No, we did sign up for the project (as part of the European Space Agency) however the UK has contributed nothing to the project as per our policy against manned space travel (1986) however British astronauts have visited the ISS.
 
Associate
Joined
13 Sep 2003
Posts
1,636
Location
Oxford, UK
Isn't this like the 7th rover to land on Mars? (the 4th to work properly)

Edit:

Its a real shame that the USSR gave up on Mars rovers when they realised the USA didn't have the capability to compete, imagine how much we could have learned already :(
Bit of a shame they didn't go for somewhere else like Io or Europa. I'd love to see some surface pics from there. The Mars stuff we're currently seeing is epic (don't get me wrong) but there is a sense of 'been there done that'. It would be nice to go somewhere else. I know they tried Venus a couple of times but it was hard to stop everything melting in the first 30 seconds. I would also assume surviving the extreme cold of further out is equally hard though.
 
Don
Joined
7 Aug 2003
Posts
44,415
Location
Aberdeenshire
Its a real shame that the USSR gave up on Mars rovers when they realised the USA didn't have the capability to compete, imagine how much we could have learned already :(
:confused:

USSR had an appalling record of success with Mars landings.

Edit: In fact every Russian lander project failed with the exception of one that landed then died after 15 seconds.
 
Soldato
Joined
7 Jul 2009
Posts
16,234
Location
Newcastle/Aberdeen
Hold on, we have a policy against manned space travel? What the hell for? :eek:

Because you know, why do something yourself when you can just pay for someone else to give it to you? Why would you ever want to make money? "Oh hey, you developed a satellite launcher for a record low cost that also happens to improve relations with another country? Yeah, we've decided that we're just going to pay the Americans for that instead."
 
Back
Top Bottom