I'm not being harsh here but you have a lot to learn about typography my friend.mrdbristol said:
edit: i've run out of inspiration for a 'scottish' sig haha:
Last edited:
I'm not being harsh here but you have a lot to learn about typography my friend.mrdbristol said:
RandomTom said:I'm not being harsh here but you have a lot to learn about typography my friend.
I think just on RameY's sig the 'bevel' style with the actual font looks a bit 'pretend' and isn't really cohesive to the style of the imagery. I know that I've had a bad block with some sigs that list the specs because there's not much you can do to make them stand out, and the one I just did for rob43 is pretty poor imo but yeh.mrdbristol said:Any pointers on typography
RandomTom said:I think just on RameY's sig the 'bevel' style with the actual font looks a bit 'pretend' and isn't really cohesive to the style of the imagery. I know that I've had a bad block with some sigs that list the specs because there's not much you can do to make them stand out, and the one I just did for rob43 is pretty poor imo but yeh.
It was only really on that sig that didn't fit imo, sorry.
I'm shocked and appalled you didn't choose to use his site for the purpose of that very image.sunlitsix said: