I'm not being harsh here but you have a lot to learn about typography my friend.mrdbristol said:

edit: i've run out of inspiration for a 'scottish' sig haha:

Last edited:
I'm not being harsh here but you have a lot to learn about typography my friend.mrdbristol said:
RandomTom said:I'm not being harsh here but you have a lot to learn about typography my friend.![]()
I think just on RameY's sig the 'bevel' style with the actual font looks a bit 'pretend' and isn't really cohesive to the style of the imagery. I know that I've had a bad block with some sigs that list the specs because there's not much you can do to make them stand out, and the one I just did for rob43 is pretty poor imo but yeh.mrdbristol said:Any pointers on typography
RandomTom said:I think just on RameY's sig the 'bevel' style with the actual font looks a bit 'pretend' and isn't really cohesive to the style of the imagery. I know that I've had a bad block with some sigs that list the specs because there's not much you can do to make them stand out, and the one I just did for rob43 is pretty poor imo but yeh.
It was only really on that sig that didn't fit imo, sorry.![]()
I'm shocked and appalled you didn't choose to use his site for the purpose of that very image.sunlitsix said: