The ongoing Elon Twitter saga: "insert demographic" melts down

Status
Not open for further replies.
FishFluff said:
Coming from you this is literally funnier than a Dave Chapelle show.
Click to expand...

You seemed keen to get me to answer why the account was banned but you're awfully quiet now it's been pointed out the user deleted his account. Maybe in future you shouldn't copy other people's work because you'll struggle to explain your working out
 
Roar87 said:
it's been pointed out the user deleted his account
Click to expand...
And that's factually correct because it fits the narrative they want. No other possiblility at all. And look at all the proof roar provides!

Out of interest, what rpoof are you providing? Surely not copying someone else's work and then unable to show your working out? Surely not! :D
 
Roar87 said:
You seemed keen to get me to answer why the account was banned but you're awfully quiet now it's been pointed out the user deleted his account. Maybe in future you shouldn't copy other people's work because you'll struggle to explain your working out
Click to expand...
If I were him I'd stay away from any Nigerian prince emails that occasionally do the rounds..
 
Roar87 said:
You seemed keen to get me to answer why the account was banned but you're awfully quiet now it's been pointed out the user deleted his account. Maybe in future you shouldn't copy other people's work because you'll struggle to explain your working out
Click to expand...
Quite the jump there - or are you assuming that Twitter can't delete accounts?
 
dLockers said:
Quite the jump there - or are you assuming that Twitter can't delete accounts?
Click to expand...

Like I said, I don't think you're allowed to post material from live comedy shows, I think the guy filming could even get sued by Dave Chapelle. Likely he deleted his own account for that reason.
 
Roar87 said:
Like I said, I don't think you're allowed to post material from live comedy shows, I think the guy filming could even get sued by Dave Chapelle. Likely he deleted his own account for that reason.
Click to expand...

This is quite possibly the case to be fair.
 
dLockers said:
This is Roar who still presumably hasn't come to any conclusions on the chap who petrol bombed the immigration centre as there wasn't enough facts.
Click to expand...
what's that got to do with insinuating twitter/musk deleted the account when the available facts show the guy deactivated the account himself? Just take the L and move on
 
Last edited:
dLockers said:
This is Roar who still presumably hasn't come to any conclusions on the chap who petrol bombed the immigration centre as there wasn't enough facts.
Click to expand...

Confused because I barely even responded in that thread, not sure if I even replied at all? lol
 
Last edited:
C Kent said:
what's that got to do with insinuating twitter/musk deleted the account when the available facts show the guy deactivated the account himself? Just take the L and move on
Click to expand...
The available facts including the bit where he thinks the user suspended their account because he may be possibly being sued by Dave Chapelle? :D
 
Demon said:
No, the real answer is prosecute/investigate them all and let the evidence / trial decide..

1. There is already the Jan 6th Cimmittee looking in to Trump isn't there? He was already impeached (and Acquitted), but we still have the ongoing Jan 6th Committee that is still progressing, so why would he need to call for something already being dealt with?
2. Covid killings - Well all leaders get a buyout from them, every nation made some 'decision' based on 'whatever' and all we have is a league table to say we who feel did better or worse just purely on deaths per capita.. Shame we couldn't do this in come cases, but it'd never stick, it would be like prosecuting a prime minister for going to war.
3. In 2020 Fauci claimed "the NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.” and the US Intelligence committe at that time said “it concurs with the wide scientific consensus that the COVID-19 virus was not manmade or genetically modified”. It turns out that A. The NIH did give an award for this to a US based company that used the Wuhan Labs (since 2014, which was renewed in 2019), and the deflection that it was not man made was also later found to be non sensical with absolutely no evidence found to support that, but plenty of evidence to support it was a Wuhan lab leak. I'd say that this was dis/misinformation on a huge scale and actually I think Fauci has something to at least be investigated for, so if that took a prosection, so be it, and the truth will out.. It's not a conspiracy theory at this point to say the Virus originated in the Wuhan labs, the bone of contention now is was that NIH award directly connected to the research that led to COVID-19 being developed (and accidentally leaked). A fair criticism and something I think should get clarity on.

I will say I think Musk should tone it all down, he might have a history of hot takes etc, but I also don't find his posts helpful either.


It would not surprise me to find he does this, but let him get called out, he wants transparency, give it to him..
Click to expand...


It isn't down to science to prove it isn't man made but to science to prove it is man made and that hasn't been proven. And it hasn't been proven it came from Wuhan either.

So yes it is an unproven theory at this point but Elon is speaking like it is fact. And his record on covid stinks.

He doesn't want transparency. That is such a red herring. If he wanted transparency he would have given everything to do with Twitter Files to independent journalists with no strings attached. Give it all to the big newspapers and let their teams trawl through it all.
 
Last edited:
dLockers said:
The available facts including the bit where he thinks the user suspended their account because he may be possibly being sued by Dave Chapelle? :D
Click to expand...
We wont know why the user deactivated his account, but Roar's reasoning is 100x more believable than thinking musk is hunting around for no mark twitter accounts and getting twitter to delete them :p
 
C Kent said:
We wont know why the user deactivated his account, but Roar's reasoning is 100x more believable than thinking musk is hunting around for no mark twitter accounts and getting twitter to delete them :p
Click to expand...
So the theory is no-named Twitter guy deactivated his own account because of conjecture? Rather than Musky boys squad of high performers vaporising the account?
 
Colonel_Klinck said:
Give it all to the big newspapers and let their teams trawl through it all.
Click to expand...
ignore, didn't see the 'all' part, although that would have been a good way to weed out the true journalists from the agenda driven ones.
dLockers said:
So the theory is no-named Twitter guy deactivated his own account because of conjecture? Rather than Musky boys squad of high performers vaporising the account?
Click to expand...
You love your CT's dont you :cry:
 
Last edited:
C Kent said:
You guys love to make up your own little ct's don't you.
:cry: :cry: :cry:
Click to expand...

Yesterday the story was the Elon was joking and doesnt want to see Fauci prosectuted he was just winding normal thinkers up. You laughed at joked about the 'left' were taking it too seriously.

Then when Elon doubled down you are all yeah Fauci should be prosecuted.

Make your ******* minds up.
 
C Kent said:
We wont know why the user deactivated his account, but Roar's reasoning is 100x more believable than thinking musk is hunting around for no mark twitter accounts and getting twitter to delete them :p
Click to expand...

Don't try common sense here, Elon was totally spending all day personally suspending low follower accounts and then making sure they were updated with a note that indicated the user deleted them, we know this because; one example of such an account that was deleted + conjecture (must have been Elon) + spaceship man bad!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom