Soldato
I thought he didn't care about money?
The ongoing Elon Twitter saga: "insert demographic" melts down
- Thread starter Energize
- Start date
- Status
If you told me when i invested £60 you'd turn it into £1200 then no, it maybe value but it's not the value you told me I'd get.
You think we should reward failure?
Soldato
And also don't forget to add, that to make the value even hit £600, you lied, over promised, made claims you knew were false but would he proven to be false only after you'd be given your reward.
What do you mean by that?
Soldato
It's a joke at the poor reply given when twitter loses value/money, it's all "it's fine Elon doesn't care about money" nonsense.
It's a reference to Roar posting multiple times that Elon doesn't care about earning money or personal wealth.
Last edited:
Soldato
Yep. He seems to care an awful lot about this money and wants Tesla board to grant him more shares and more control of the company even after he sold a significant chunk of that control off.
Soldato
Surely this isn't true?
I've not been following the story at all, but that post infers this was all agreed/voted on in 2018 and Musk hit all these crazy milestones (or thereabouts) and some 9 share nobody comes in later on and states he thinks it isn't fair and somehow a judge sided with that?
I see people saying he grossly missed his targets, so what where the real targets that deal was based on then?
Soldato
well that wouldn't make sense would it, that a judge came to the conclusion they have based on what some whiny child cries when writing an article. have you thought about looking up for the true facts of the case?
btw funny little bit of info to add, this is the same judge that decided elon had to buy twitter after he tried to get out of it.
Last edited:
Commissario
That is amusing, but probably not overly surprising given there is a limited pool of judges, and even more limited for those with the experience of complex contract/commercial law.
Although Delaware IIRC does have a lot more than most who can deal with these cases because it's basically what the state decided to specialise in, being a good place for businesses to be registered if they want to make sure their contracts have teeth.
It's just a shame for poor Musk that he's finding out that contracts and commercial law actually require you to uphold your end of the deal in every mutually agreed "reasonable" aspect.
Last edited:
Soldato
That Twitter account talks to Elon like he is a man-god, I take anything it says with a bucket of salt. I don't know how these people look themselves in the mirror the way they fawn over him.
Soldato
From what I've read the judge thought Elon had the board in his pocket and so they weren't acting as a board should. That wouldn't surprise me, he is a control freak and throws tantrums when he doesn't get his own way.
Last edited:
Soldato
Imagine making corporate decisions from a vote on Twitter 
and this parody account has about the same IQ as the real MTG
and this parody account has about the same IQ as the real MTG
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 19 May 2010
- Posts
- 1,349
Mind you, he also said in regards to purchasing Twitter that he didn't care about the economics at all, and it was all about the free speech aspects.
For some reason though, when asked if he would prop it up after advertisers left, he cried like a manbaby and said he'd let it die rather than saving it with his own money.
Soldato
This.
If the independent remuneration committee are not acting independently then its perfectly acceptable for a shareholder to challenge those packages.
They have fallen out of the conscious a bit but a few years ago there were a LOT of shareholder challenges to remuneration packages going on.
Did you just make that up? He hit all the milestones. I swear this is same derangement as with Trump.
Soldato
Yes it does feel thst way. The same derangement that leads some to think that all judges are politically influenced, rather than the facts just don't match the false safe space they want to be true.
Perhaps you should tell the judge the evidence you have to let her know she got it wrong. Or.... Accept reality rather than, what is you call it, ah yes, have a "deranged view" of the situation? Might be an idea.
Last edited:
Please stop replying to every single post I make when it isn't even a reply to you, it isn't healthy. You personally have derangement around me.
Soldato
Perhaps you don't need to tell someone else they suffer from derangement, when they are able to accept the facts of the case, while you're trying so hard to refute them with no facts, just hope and feels that it isn't true that Elon lost.
Have you thought about accepting reality here? The judge saw the facts and came to the obvious conclusion. What do you know that the judge doesn't? Other than the judge isn't allowed to do something horrible and mean to poor Elon
Your suggestion that others are deranged all around you, but not you, perhaps there's a hint here you should consider.
And don't take it personally, especially putting your own silly words back to you. Even though you "lost interest" in this thread, you're one of the top posters so of course you'll get one of the most replies. And especially when you tell someone else they are the deranged one for being able to accept reality while the same day you come up with conspiracy that all judges are politically influenced right now.
Last edited:
Soldato
Is this your latest interpretation of free speech?
It sounds very much aligned with Elons version:
"Only free when your agreeing with me!"
Last edited:
- Status