Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2005
- Posts
- 3,281
- Location
- The South
You punted this theory a few pages back and it doesn't really seem to hold water.Musk’s worth is based on the (insanely overpriced) Tesla stock. He needed the deal to act as an excuse to liquidate some of that stock into actual cash without looking like he was just withdrawing from the company at its most valuable and thus tanking the share price (again).
He doesn’t give a **** about any of his companies, just his own appearance and how he can feed his own ego.
Have you got any sources that suggests this is the case? Did he liquidate more Tesla stock that the amount he was putting up for the purchase (with banks funding the larger portion of the purchase)?
So he's letting the public know something we already knew*, whilst putting himself on the hook for the very good possibility of either losing a billion dollars or being forced to purchase the business?Because it doesn't matter, it isn't a criminal trial, it's lawyers who's salary he pays anyway. It seems like he's making a point about how bad the botting is on Twitter, and since it's Elon Musk he doesn't really give a **** if it puts him out of pocket by a few quid.
![Confused :confused: :confused:](/styles/default/xenforo/vbSmilies/Normal/confused.gif)
It doesn't make him look particularly good, in fact it makes him look rather inept.
* Has he even published any figures given Twitter handed over 53tb+ worth of data?