The "Post your pictures here" thread.

Status
Not open for further replies.
A really nice shot, apart from the little white dust specs! always clean your still life! :P

lol mine is scratched to hell living life on a beach haha ... nice photo !!!

and to photo above love urbex pics !!!! i havent been in so long to a site its hideous !!!!
 
3618081902_d902b4ac12_o.jpg
 
amazing photo !!!

Thank you. :)

Here's another from the same 'shoot' I finished Post-Processing earlier.

3619399921_cda6d221a5_o.jpg


Photoshop, with that second shot I see you used f/1.4 but the DOF looks MUCH more shallow, did you use a tilt-shift type effect in your Post-processing for that photo?
 
on a side note photoshop your photography skills have just doubled and doubled and doubled with every photo there !!! id love to know what youve either been reading or know how you process !

Cheers mate. Appreciate the kind comments.
I've only had my DSLR for around 2 months or so now and other than watching a few videos on you tube regarding aperture, lenses and modes, I haven't really read anything. I've posted a few threads over at AVF asking for advice and posted a lot in the Sony Alpha thread to learn about the A200 DSLR.

Those photos came out pretty good directly from the camera. All I have done is sharpened them using the "Smart Sharpen" filter in PS with a setting of around 60%. On someone of them i have used the "Auto Contrast" setting to make them just a tad darker. I find this helps make the foreground or the item in focus just stand out that little bit more without making it look processed.

The first picture is obviously touched up with HDR within PS. I've realised HDR is much easier and better with buildings and man made items/structures (because of the contrasting materials and straight lines) but not so good with still life and nature as the colours are more softer and blurred and applying HDR adds a lot of noise!. I wouldn't recommend HDR treatment for natural shots.

Obviously there is only so much you can do with post processing. The image has to be good out the camera really so i would just suggest use the best settings and always shoot in RAW.
I think most of those photos came out really well thanks to the Minolta 50mm f1.4!


Photoshop, with that second shot I see you used f/1.4 but the DOF looks MUCH more shallow, did you use a tilt-shift type effect in your Post-processing for that photo?

No mate. Other than some sharpening in PS i haven't done anything to that picture. I just got as close as I could to the stick and took the photo.
The lens is that good! Its a firm favourite of mine because I just love the bokeh and the DOF that can be achieved. I think every photographer should have one!

PS. what is tilt -shift?

I've a funny feeling that his name isn't photoshop by coincidence :p but agreed his photography skills are very impressive for only having a camera a short time :cool:

Cheers Derek.
My PS skills are very limited to be honest with you. Other than using image resize, sharpening, auto contract/colour, adding border features I don't really know my way around PS. Picked up the HDR methods using the online tutorials but I wish I was a pro around photoshop. I mostly rely on my camera to do all the work. Now that I have got a few descent lenses it makes that a little easier too.
 
Last edited:
The first picture is obviously touched up with HDR within PS. I've realised HDR is much easier and better with buildings and man made items/structures (because of the contrasting materials and straight lines) but not so good with still life and nature as the colours are more softer and blurred and applying HDR adds a lot of noise!. I wouldn't recommend HDR treatment for natural shots.

Not sure if you know this already, but there's two types of HDR, or atleast there is on Photomatix Pro which is what I use. One is detail enhancement (what you've used), and the other is tone enhancement. I find the latter is excellent for landscapes and shots with a fair amount of natural scenery. The last two pictures I posted have a subtle use of HDR.

PS. what is tilt -shift?

It's a type of lens that blurs the foreground and background, making the focal point appear further away, or toy-like. It's do-able in post-processing though. E.g.

20080423133438_tiltshift_1.jpg
 
Not sure if you know this already, but there's two types of HDR, or atleast there is on Photomatix Pro which is what I use. One is detail enhancement (what you've used), and the other is tone enhancement. I find the latter is excellent for landscapes and shots with a fair amount of natural scenery. The last two pictures I posted have a subtle use of HDR.



It's a type of lens that blurs the foreground and background, making the focal point appear further away, or toy-like. It's do-able in post-processing though. E.g.

Cheers for the tip. I must try Photomatix.

I see, so that is what tilt shift is. To be honest i've seen pictures like that before and I wasn't impressed. The do look toy like and almost frozen. Its a bit different to what i've been posting as in my shots the background is so blurred that all you see is just colours without any resemblance to anything and that's how i like it because it creates a really nice backdrop for the subject that is in focus.
 
^^ Nice Dan, please do tell set up, location etc ...

Thanks. It was taken on the top of the new Quays carpark in Gloucester. That was the ramp to get to the lower levels.

As soon as I saw it I knew I wanted to get a rig shot going down it, and it worked out really well I think :)
 
Thanks. It was taken on the top of the new Quays carpark in Gloucester. That was the ramp to get to the lower levels.

As soon as I saw it I knew I wanted to get a rig shot going down it, and it worked out really well I think :)

i take it was car + tipod ? if so how did you keep it so still, i always get extra wobble etc ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom