The "Post your pictures here" thread.

Status
Not open for further replies.


Overcooked? Undercooked? My processing remains experimental rather than actually having a vision and knowing how to get there...
 
I dont have photoshop atm so i'm having to make do. Could i just have some constructive feedback on these pictures:

ng582c.jpg


34ewzfd.jpg
 
Hungryjoey said:
Came off FB, so its tiny in size.

Dublin Docklands;

http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash2/hs464.ash2/73729_10150124226622977_513097976_7622751_2167170_n.jpg[img][/QUOTE]

Lovely photo! However, you're aware you give up the rights to the photo when you upload it to Facebook, right? :p

[quote="Mud, post: 17660546"][URL="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kmud/5118336309/"][IMG]http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4091/5118336309_6b064b3b1e_z.jpg[IMG][URL]

Overcooked? Undercooked? My processing remains experimental rather than actually having a vision and knowing how to get there...[/QUOTE]

Awesome photo! Which fisheye do you have? :)
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Mud said:
Thanks, 16/2.8D. I haven't had it long and bought it new, so I'm betting Nikon will soon put out a much-improved AF-S N version.
Click to expand...

well after that shot I think that lens has to be added to the wish-list, excellent shot ! and by looking at a few reviews great lens
 
Guy in the background looks a bit ghost like :p

Was bored, so I ventured out to the roof. Subject isn't brilliant but the sky is cool. Gives me some ideas for future shots

mrtnyt.jpg
 
knowlesy said:
well after that shot I think that lens has to be added to the wish-list, excellent shot ! and by looking at a few reviews great lens
Click to expand...

It's a little low on contrast and the chromatic aberration is pretty bad (though CS5's lens profile does a good job on it). The 10.5/2.8DX is optically better, but the 16/2.8D being FX gives better overall performance.
 
Mud said:
It's a little low on contrast and the chromatic aberration is pretty bad (though CS5's lens profile does a good job on it). The 10.5/2.8DX is optically better, but the 16/2.8D being FX gives better overall performance.
Click to expand...


I was looking at the 10.5/2.8DX iirc after reading the review for that lens as I only have a dx sensor :( so Id need that at lease to get something similar
 
knowlesy said:
I was looking at the 10.5/2.8DX iirc after reading the review for that lens as I only have a dx sensor :( so Id need that at lease to get something similar
Click to expand...

I've had the 10.5/2.8 and it's great, you're much more likely to find one second hand too. If I were on DX I wouldn't give it a second thought, get the 10.5/2.8 or look into the cheaper (and fully manual) Samyang that MartinTurner has been showing off :)
 
First time posting in here and my first attempt ad editing!
These were taken in South Africa, unfortunately the original looked a lot better on my camera screen than on my monitor which is massivly dissappointing! Hence me attempting to edit them /play about with the settings :(

C&C please

Original:
elephants.jpg


Edited:
Saturation a bit too high here?
elephants1.jpg


Another edit:
elephants2.jpg
 
Last edited:
V nice Phate :)



Had a go at shooting a band during rehearsal, just a quick one I've PP'd. (I bloody hate the ironing board in the BG but there's only so much Photoshop can do lol =/)


MattScreamEdit.jpg



Any tips for shooting bands are greatly appreciated :).
 
I think it works, BW is toned nicely too! Just maybe if it was showing more of the trunk in portrait in that BW :)


One from today:
_MG_4327-Edit.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom