A dusk shot over the beach from a week's trip to Turkey.
Sunset over Sarigerme by Greg Kingston, on Flickr
Sunset over Sarigerme by Greg Kingston, on Flickr
Last edited:
Hi guys, I've just picked up a dslr and would really appreciate some feedback. These photos are unprocessed unless you count resizing them, so any tips you would like to share would be awesome. I did post these in flora and fauna, but nobody seems interested in updating that thread.
Anyway:
http://www.markgerry.plus.com/ocuk/photos/fish.jpg[IMG]
[IMG]http://www.markgerry.plus.com/ocuk/photos/IMG_0133.jpg[IMG]
[IMG]http://www.markgerry.plus.com/ocuk/photos/IMG_0134.jpg[IMG]
[IMG]http://www.markgerry.plus.com/ocuk/photos/IMG_0135.jpg[/MG]
[IMG]http://www.markgerry.plus.com/ocuk/photos/IMG_0136.jpg[IMG]
[IMG]http://www.markgerry.plus.com/ocuk/photos/IMG_0284.jpg[IMG]
I am experimenting with night photography tonight and took this:
[IMG]http://www.markgerry.plus.com/ocuk/photos/moon.jpg[IMG]
The night portrait mode on the 700d isn't very good, so I put it into manual. The above picture I cropped to remove a little of the sky.[/QUOTE]
There are a few issues that you would wan to address before looking at processing for these shots.
fish: it's a little bit blurred, and it looks like you were trying to catch the fish mid-jump, so keep an eye on your shutter speed (try shutter priority and set a fast shutter speed of 1/200 or higher) to help you freeze the fish. Also, the rest of the scene doesn't add much so try cropping out the extra water to make the fish more of a focal point in the frame, or get closer if you can.
flowers: a couple of these are out of focus, but mainly the issue is the distracting grass and twigs that detract from the main subject. You've used a wide aperture to try to remove that clutter, which is good, but it wasn't wide enough. If your lens doesn't open up any wider, try getting closer to the subject to minimise depth of field and increase the blurring effect, or ideally remove the distracting objects (nothing wrong with flattening down a bit of grass or holding a twig out of the way while you shoot). Also, the stems of the flower aren't particularly attractive, so maybe try an angle that capitalises on the good bit (again, getting closer would help). If it's windy, erect a shield out of a jacket etc to stop the flower blowing out of your field of focus or use a twig to prop it up.
moon: that's actually very good. It looks like you've hit the limitations of your lens here, but you could try applying some sharpening to bring out some more detail. Your exposure is solid though, which is the hardest part when shooting the moon.
Been a while since i posted in here...Been a while since I've done any serious shooting to be honest! Been enjoying myself for summer though so I don't mind too much. Here's a couple of the new addition to the family.
<snip>
It's a bit of a trend at the moment, that style of processing. I've seen a hell of a lot of wedding/event photographers using that in the last year. It seems to be a cleaner version of the 70s style of photos you used to see.
Personally it's not my cuppa but it must be making people money as it's so popular currently. Not sure why but it seems kind of odd to me, as if the processing went wonky in a lab
VSCO is amazing. I've got all 4 packs and fine tuned my most used presets from each one. Big fan of the 70s and 80s film colour.
A couple I took yesterday of the Reds at Portrush Airshow:
That's absolutely fantastic!