The Queen doesn't need to have a Driving Licence

Permabanned
Joined
13 Nov 2006
Posts
5,798
Is this true? and can the Queen not be prosecuted for anything?

What would happen if she ran somebody over whilst drunk and is she bound by laws from Canada and Australia too?
 
Its true.

I seen her in a Veyron driving down Coronation Street with a fag in one hand and a G&T in the other, she was steering with her knees.
 
Pretty sure that she would need a driving licence. Isn't the point of the Magna Carta that the law applies to the monarch as well as the people.

She does drive too - mostly a land rover off road from what I believe from such films as "The Queen" - dozy bint broke down in the middle of a stream.
 
She should have to. shes the queen for gods sakes. Should be able to do what the hell she wants. Including sacrificing midgets
 
Did you know that she can go any where she wants aswell.


She could walk into your house put the kettle on, make a cup of tea, sit down and watch Never Mind The Buzzcocks while her dogs **** on the carpet and you wouldn't be able to do a thing about it.
 
She drove an ambulance in the second world war. Obviously she is allowed to drive herself around on her estates.

I doubt you would ever see her out driving on the public road...
 
She did drive a Land Rover in the film "The Queen", but being a woman managed to break it down and had to have someone come out to sort it for her.

If she didn't have a license I wouldn't be surprised if Gordon found a spot for her in Holloway.
 
She could walk into your house put the kettle on, make a cup of tea, sit down and watch Never Mind The Buzzcocks while her dogs **** on the carpet and you wouldn't be able to do a thing about it.

I'd just throw her to the floor and ask her what the hell she's doing? :confused:

Cheeky 'ho. :p
 
Back
Top Bottom