• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

The Radeon RX 5700 XT Owners Thread.

pugheaven said:
Assuming you're running at 1080P Extreme and that's maximum fps? For reference mine is:

Superposition benchmark: clock @ 2005/1900: Min:31.49fps, Avg:39.18fps and Max:46.38fps
Click to expand...

1440p high textures/shaders average fps 54.59 score is 7298.

Stable* @ 1900/920mv. *I was just getting an issue where video that went from window to full screen in potsplayer and K-Lite/MPC (but not VLC) had an access violation error, even in stock clock/volts. Shutdown and reboot fixed this.
 
Hi Folks,

I've just made a new build - AMD 3900X, Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite, 32GB of 3600Mhz RAM (16-16-16-36) and a Gigabyte 5700XT Aorus.

Cooling is the stock cooler, and its in a Lian Li Dynamic case, 3 120MM fans blowing up at it. the 3 on the side of the case blowing in, and then 3 exhausts on the top (on the 360MM AIO radiator).

I'm just wondering as this card seems to be quite sporting with its timing already, is there much point using the overclocking feature in the AMD Radeon drivers. I imagine it wont go much higher than the 2010Mhz Core Clock boost it already achieves.
 
Conanius said:
Hi Folks,

I've just made a new build - AMD 3900X, Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite, 32GB of 3600Mhz RAM (16-16-16-36) and a Gigabyte 5700XT Aorus.

Cooling is the stock cooler, and its in a Lian Li Dynamic case, 3 120MM fans blowing up at it. the 3 on the side of the case blowing in, and then 3 exhausts on the top (on the 360MM AIO radiator).

I'm just wondering as this card seems to be quite sporting with its timing already, is there much point using the overclocking feature in the AMD Radeon drivers. I imagine it wont go much higher than the 2010Mhz Core Clock boost it already achieves.
Click to expand...

You should be able to undervolt from the stock 1200mV and get the same boost clock but at a lower temp and thus less fan speed. Is that 2010Mhz in game? I get 2000Mhz at 1070mV. It can run faster but I like my junction in the 70s.
 
LoadsaMoney said:
Click to expand...
I'm liking their videos. The 5700 XT is a bargain compared to what nVidia offers no doubt. With nVidia you get better drivers (eg my Radeon Software overlay either crashes itself or crashes the game I'm playing, so I just don't use it), RTX not this gen yet, DLSS, slightly faster (but not really if you have to pay more).
 
Last edited:
LiE said:
You should be able to undervolt from the stock 1200mV and get the same boost clock but at a lower temp and thus less fan speed. Is that 2010Mhz in game? I get 2000Mhz at 1070mV. It can run faster but I like my junction in the 70s.
Click to expand...

So it does it in games but it sort of wanders up and down there as needed... which I guess is expected behaviour?
 
Right ok, I ran the following benchmarks twice just to see a little more in real terms what clocking of these cards gives, took the average and here is what we got:

Default 5700XT Clocks (1755mhz-gpu/1750mhz-mem, boost 1905mhz)
Superposition Benchmark 1080p Extreme: Score:4,736, Min:28.41fps, Avg:35.43fps, Max:42.20fps
3DMark TimeSpy Default: Score:7,039, Graphics Score:8,383, Test1:57.17fps, Test2:46.01fps
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme: Score:10,300, Graphics Score:12,068, Test1:60.36fps, Test2:46.41fps

Overclcoked 5700XT Clocks (2079mhz-gpu/1900mhz-mem, boost 2079mhz, 1176mv-voltage)
Superposition Benchmark 1080p Extreme: Score:5,246 Min:31.39fps, Avg:39.24fps, Max:46.72fps
3DMark TimeSpy Default: Score:7,647, Graphics Score:9,467, Test1:65.39fps, Test2:51.71fps
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme: Score:, Graphics Score:13,502, Test1:67.75fps, Test2:51.79fps

So, based on that lot we get the following % increase in fps based on those overclocks:

Superposition Benchmark: Avg fps = 9.7% Increase
3DMark TimeSpy Default: Test1 fps = 12.6% Increase, Test2 fps = 11.0% Increase
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme: Test1 fps = 10.9% Increase, Test2 fps = 10.4% Increase

So, basically, looking at this, going from stock to overclocked can give you circa 10-12% better fps. I assume it'll go for games as well. However, that sounds great, but lets be honest, let put that into real figures. OK, you're running 60fps at default, that means around 66-67.2fps at overclocked speeds... is that worth the hassle? I don't know, suppose it's what we all do to try and push our gear to get the most out of it, but all the hassle, more power, clocking, stability testing and everything all for that? hahahaha...
 
pugheaven said:
Right ok, I ran the following benchmarks twice just to see a little more in real terms what clocking of these cards gives, took the average and here is what we got:

Default 5700XT Clocks (1755mhz-gpu/1750mhz-mem, boost 1905mhz)
Superposition Benchmark 1080p Extreme: Score:4,736, Min:28.41fps, Avg:35.43fps, Max:42.20fps
3DMark TimeSpy Default: Score:7,039, Graphics Score:8,383, Test1:57.17fps, Test2:46.01fps
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme: Score:10,300, Graphics Score:12,068, Test1:60.36fps, Test2:46.41fps

Overclcoked 5700XT Clocks (2079mhz-gpu/1900mhz-mem, boost 2079mhz, 1176mv-voltage)
Superposition Benchmark 1080p Extreme: Score:5,246 Min:31.39fps, Avg:39.24fps, Max:46.72fps
3DMark TimeSpy Default: Score:7,647, Graphics Score:9,467, Test1:65.39fps, Test2:51.71fps
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme: Score:, Graphics Score:13,502, Test1:67.75fps, Test2:51.79fps

So, based on that lot we get the following % increase in fps based on those overclocks:

Superposition Benchmark: Avg fps = 9.7% Increase
3DMark TimeSpy Default: Test1 fps = 12.6% Increase, Test2 fps = 11.0% Increase
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme: Test1 fps = 10.9% Increase, Test2 fps = 10.4% Increase

So, basically, looking at this, going from stock to overclocked can give you circa 10-12% better fps. I assume it'll go for games as well. However, that sounds great, but lets be honest, let put that into real figures. OK, you're running 60fps at default, that means around 66-67.2fps at overclocked speeds... is that worth the hassle? I don't know, suppose it's what we all do to try and push our gear to get the most out of it, but all the hassle, more power, clocking, stability testing and everything all for that? hahahaha...
Click to expand...
But if you set it at 2100mhz at 1100\1150mv, your getting better performance, lower temps, and more efficient card than leaving it at stock to do its thing. Plus, it's not much hassle with a simple 2 setting change?
 
BigRazer93 said:
But if you set it at 2100mhz at 1100\1150mv, your getting better performance, lower temps, and more efficient card than leaving it at stock to do its thing. Plus, it's not much hassle with a simple 2 setting change?
Click to expand...
Only if it works at that setting, not when it doesn't work at that setting, means you messing around to find your own limits, mine won't work at 2100mhz core for any voltage at all, might just be you get the better quality bits with more expensive cards hence for me to tweak and get the best performance, temp etc was a pain in the arse. If it was as easy as doing that we'd all be doing that and unfortnaley for me, those settings freeze within seconds of Warfare or any benchmarking software. Infact I can't go above 1900 on the core at

Anyway, that's by the by, what I was saying was, in the gran scheme of things, finding whatever your clock is, and then only getting around 10% improvement... a lot of hassle imho even though I did it, but hey, swings and roundabouts.
 
pugheaven said:
Only if it works at that setting, not when it doesn't work at that setting, means you messing around to find your own limits, mine won't work at 2100mhz core for any voltage at all, might just be you get the better quality bits with more expensive cards hence for me to tweak and get the best performance, temp etc was a pain in the arse. If it was as easy as doing that we'd all be doing that and unfortnaley for me, those settings freeze within seconds of Warfare or any benchmarking software. Infact I can't go above 1900 on the core at

Anyway, that's by the by, what I was saying was, in the gran scheme of things, finding whatever your clock is, and then only getting around 10% improvement... a lot of hassle imho even though I did it, but hey, swings and roundabouts.
Click to expand...
It's wired that you can't go above 1900mhz on the core without crashing.

Which 5700xt did you get?
 
BigRazer93 said:
It's wired that you can't go above 1900mhz on the core without crashing.

Which 5700xt did you get?
Click to expand...
sorry weidly it deleted some of that sentrance. What I'd put was it won't let me go above 1900 on the core at 1125, I need 1150mv for some reason. I got the powercolor cheapest at £329 probably explain. Don't bother me as I've got over 2000 now, but I just need more voltage than others it seems.
 
pugheaven said:
@Dying_Snail loving the white theme mate... tbh your rigs are making mine look crap... I'm thinking of some upgrades now while I'm stuck in the house hahaha... everytime I come on here I end up spending money lol
Click to expand...

Thank you, i love it too but I wont be happy and it will look better when I get white cable extensions just to tidy it up a bit.
And I get that about coming on here lol.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom