• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

The Radeon RX 7900 XT(X) Owners Thread.

Can a Nitro owner test their card both horizontal and vertical please to see if the vapor x chamber works as well in any position.
Sure, I'll run a stress test now while I make dinner.

Edit:
Although, my sapphire MBA will hit 110c in any orientation within 10 mins even without high power limits, delta is around 50c worse case scenarios almost 60c. Any powerlimit above +5% just worsens this gap and the rate it hits those temperatures.
Noticeably, junction temp will jump from 110c to down to 55c almost instantly when the test ends. It doesn't gradually lower which is odd.

So far the highest I've seen the nitro+ hit is 91c and tends to stay there even with with +15% on the power limit.

So far with my case on its side I'm looking at temps of 71c and 91c on the nitro+, with stock fan settings. Will keep it going to see if that changes though. In comparison the largest delta I've seen is 20c on the nitro compared to 59c and above on the mba.
 
Last edited:
@LtMatt - you have noted the wattage that your new Nitro can pull, not sure if that was at max...? But not the 483w mentioned somewhere else in this forum that might be possible with a Nitro. Compared to the TUF you had how much of a difference is that making in terms of performance and is that max performance compromised at all due to to bigger and better (?) cooler on the TUF meaning it runs hooter or louder with the Nitro....?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
@LtMatt - you have noted the wattage that your new Nitro can pull, not sure if that was at max...? But not the 483w mentioned somewhere else in this forum that might be possible with a Nitro. Compared to the TUF you had how much of a difference is that making in terms of performance and is that max performance compromised at all due to to bigger and better (?) cooler on the TUF meaning it runs hooter or louder with the Nitro....?

Thanks.
There’s also a YouTube video of the nitro hitting 500w. https://youtu.be/XaEWPgPDF7U
 
@LtMatt - you have noted the wattage that your new Nitro can pull, not sure if that was at max...? But not the 483w mentioned somewhere else in this forum that might be possible with a Nitro. Compared to the TUF you had how much of a difference is that making in terms of performance and is that max performance compromised at all due to to bigger and better (?) cooler on the TUF meaning it runs hooter or louder with the Nitro....?

Thanks.
There’s also a YouTube video of the nitro hitting 500w. https://youtu.be/XaEWPgPDF7U
The Nitro pulls 465W total board power according to HWINFO64 with +15% set. . If you measure actual power draw like Kitguru did, I suspect it will be higher and closer to the 483W-500W value that was quoted. The TUF pulls 431W total board power in comparison with +15%. The performance difference can be seen in my Port Royal Ray Tracing tests for the Nitro here and the TUF here. The performance difference is about 3%, so not huge. The TUF has the better cooler in terms of temperatures, its huge. Both are good though, and both quiet. TUF louder at 100% fan speed, think the fans move faster and move more air.
 
Last edited:
Can a Nitro owner test their card both horizontal and vertical please to see if the vapor x chamber works as well in any position.
I'd be interested to see this tested for all the custom cards, in all six possible orientations. Especially the one orientation that the MBA can't handle (monitor outputs at the top).
 
What clocks, power limits and fan speeds were you using for this? I will copy and run Speedway too for a comparison but it will take me some time as I'll capture it on video.
Core:
Min Freq: 500 Mhz
Max Freq: 3400 Mhz
1100mV


Vram:
Fast timings
2648 Mhz

Power limit 15%
Stock fan speeds
 
How on earth did you manage that score and those temps by the way?
23c ambient when I did that too Lol. Was running an undervolt at 1.010mv, 100% fan speed. I'd put liquid metal on the GPU core too, so that may have helped reduce temps a little bit from stock.

The Nitro is still power limited. Give me more power and I will score more. So even the highest available XTX at this time is still held back by power limit.
 
Last edited:
23c ambient when I did that too Lol. Was running an undervolt at 1.010mv, 100% fan speed. I'd put liquid metal on the GPU core too, so that may have helped reduce temps a little bit from stock.

The Nitro is still power limited. Give me more power and I will score more. So even the highest available XTX at this time is still held back by power limit.
1010mv?
Is there a list you need to be on to get good samples like that? :p
 
1010mv?
Is there a list you need to be on to get good samples like that? :p
That is not stable in games, need way higher. But for synthetics it works. Firestrike Ultra needed 1.020v. Games need at least 1.060mv, and I think I might even need higher than that to be truly stable most likely 1070mv-1.080mv.

Been busy at work this week, but will get some proper time on the weekend to play some games and put some YouTube videos up.
 
Last edited:
That is not stable in games, need way higher. But for synthetics it works. Firestrike Ultra needed 1.020v. Games need at least 1.060mv, and I think I might even need higher than that to be truly stable most likely 1070mv-1.080mv.

Been busy at work this week, but will get some proper time on the weekend to play some games and put some YouTube videos up.

How many PCs do you have? I'm sure you had a 4090
 
Back
Top Bottom