• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

The Radeon RX9070XT / RX9070 Owners Thread

My Pulse XT seems to be running Samsung which is fortunate because it's squashed inside a Dan A4 H2O :D

AGKTCkUl.jpg


6TX4VYgl.jpg
 
What are your settings if you don’t mind? Thanks
It was actually 31822,and I used one of these settings from @Parky

 
Last edited:
Best Adrenaline alternative?
Sounds like MoreClockTool / MorePowerTool is the way to go?

Came back to my PC, GPU core at 70 degrees, hot spot 95, mem at 90 (Samsung), fans barely moving. Windows render glitching.

Adrenaline had decided to drop my tuning settings. Undervolt etc gone, but fans stuck on v low
 
Best Adrenaline alternative?
Sounds like MoreClockTool / MorePowerTool is the way to go?

Came back to my PC, GPU core at 70 degrees, hot spot 95, mem at 90 (Samsung), fans barely moving. Windows render glitching.

Adrenaline had decided to drop my tuning settings. Undervolt etc gone, but fans stuck on v low
You GPU driver had crashed and Adrenalin restores defaults. That's normal. You've no doubt pushed your UV too much.

Mem at 90! That must have been 100% utilisation. What was your PC doing at the time?
 
Last edited:
You GPU driver had crashed and Adrenalin restores defaults. That's normal. You've no doubt pushed your UV too much.
Doubt it, UV was -40 at the time it happened. Backed it off recently after some instability when pushing harder in specific titles (Diablo4)

I was idle in a game frontend, no fps cap so maxing out the GPU at 100% and 250-300fps.
Under normal conditions, the fans spin up and it sits at ~72 hot spot, 57 core, 64 mem. But whatever happened to adrenalin caused the fans to barely move, no airflow, things started cooking. So, i no longer trust it. The loss of tuning is fine, the fans not ramping up is not fine
 
Doubt it, UV was -40 at the time it happened. Backed it off recently after some instability when pushing harder in specific titles (Diablo4)

this thread will help
 
Doubt it, UV was -40 at the time it happened. Backed it off recently after some instability when pushing harder in specific titles (Diablo4)

I was idle in a game frontend, no fps cap so maxing out the GPU at 100% and 250-300fps.
Under normal conditions, the fans spin up and it sits at ~72 hot spot, 57 core, 64 mem. But whatever happened to adrenalin caused the fans to barely move, no airflow, things started cooking. So, i no longer trust it. The loss of tuning is fine, the fans not ramping up is not fine
UV at -40mV is still a UV and isn't guaranteed to work, you may have just got poor silicon. It's more likely to crash with light weight stuff due to the GPU frequency boosting to 3.4Ghz+ where this GPU becomes highly unstable, unless you've adjusted the max frequency offset to compensate.
The drivers 100% crashed although it should have reverted to whatever the stock fan profile is, never seen the fans go to a fixed low speed before.
 
Afternoon all. I picked up a Gigabyte AORUS Radeon RX 9070 XT Elite just over a week ago, and it's been a pretty good upgrade for my Ultrawide gaming. The first thing I did with it on my PC was run Furmark 2 and it was all good for about 30 minutes. Since then, I've had one minor issue with it. I loaded up Elite Dangerous whilst I was watching a YouTube video on my other monitor, and the game loaded, I got all the music, the Youtube video kept playing, but then both monitors just went completely blank with no signal. I could still hear the music from Elite, and the audio from the Youtube video, but no signal and it was like that for a few mins before I decided to power off the PC.

After I switched the PC back on again, there was still no output to the monitors, so I restarted it again but it was still the same. I then took the GPU out of the PC, but before doing so I checked to make sure there were no loose connections on the power cables, and all was good. After removing, reseating, and then powering back on again, I got an initial response of no signal, but then eventually after restarting again, everything came back and Windows loaded.

Once in Windows, Adrenalin had completely reset and it came up under the notifications that it had reset to defaults due to an unexpected error. I couldn't find any logs for the GPU, and Event Viewer has been pretty useless as it hasn't got any info for me either.

Anyone experienced anything like that with their 9070XT? Since that happened the GPU has been fine, I've run Furmark on it as well as Superposition and OCCT, and everything has been fine. I have obviously noted as some report that the RAM runs pretty hot, between 80 - 90 degrees, but the fans don't seem to be running too loudly and the GPU core temp remains at around 68 - 70 degrees under load in Furmark and the other stress tests. I'm not too concerned as there's a 4 year warranty on my GPU, but still, I'm hoping I don't have a dud!
 
UV at -40mV is still a UV and isn't guaranteed to work, you may have just got poor silicon.
Yeah, true, but for -40 to fail (and fail quickly) i'd have to be pretty unlucky.

Was starting to suspect a busted card, but now i'm thinking software again...
Running Heaven : Core Temp 66degs, hot spot 89, fans 52%, clocks 3260, core 1.12v, power 310. It's *loud* after the first 10 seconds and stays like this

Moving between Default / Performance / Efficiency settings in Adrenalin does nothing, only custom has any effect

So card is sitting at 200MHz higher than the stock max boost, voltage looks high (10% over stock i think), fans ramp up twice as high as in reviews (25-30%). Temps are warm, but voltage + boost explain that.
*Something* is forcing extra power and extra boost clocks, and i suspect the reported undervolt setting is wrong too (could be -130, could be +50, no idea)
 
Was starting to suspect a busted card, but now i'm thinking software again...

look at this thread, most people have problems with the drivers, and it just a simple set up problem
 
  • Like
Reactions: dis
i also use "fan Controller" to monitor the fan and not the AMD software. i have it fixed at 10% and at 50c hotspot 25%
on my GPU that keeps the card silent but also the hotspot around 65c and GPU in the high 40's
 
me thinks there as been a driver update for the 9070's like AMD did with the 5000 GPU...

I'm benchmarking me new system (same GPU) and i cant get passed 2950mhz(core) and 2820mhz(ram)
but my GPU as done a lot faster in the passed.

it doesn't crash, but no matter when i set the cores wont pass the setting....
AMD did this with a GPU im not 100% on what model(it was a long time ago and im old..)it was but it used die as next the GPU up and with very easy OC your could match the speeds of said high tear GPU so AMD capped it with a hard lock in the driver.

my GPU as benched at 3100mhz / 2870mhz in the passed, ever loading that save file results in 2950mhz / 2820mhz
 
Last edited:
me thinks there as been a driver update for the 9070's like AMD did with the 5000 GPU...
Yeah, new hardware and probably changing things a lot right now

Your temps are great, i can't get anywhere near them (but depends which app i'm running).
At stock : Timespy clocks are OK (3000MHz) but power/voltage is too high. Heaven is average 3260 and high voltage. Diablo4 is 3000 or less and normal/low voltage (0.85).

For now, i'm running -300clock and -20 power, to get back to 'stock' settings. Will wait and see what happens to drivers in a month or two.

I *might* try and old driver version, haven't seen any of the early reviews complaining about high boost clocks, so could be a recent driver issue
 
Last edited:
me thinks there as been a driver update for the 9070's like AMD did with the 5000 GPU...

I'm benchmarking me new system (same GPU) and i cant get passed 2950mhz(core) and 2820mhz(ram)
but my GPU as done a lot faster in the passed.

it doesn't crash, but no matter when i set the cores wont pass the setting....
AMD did this with a GPU im not 100% on what model(it was a long time ago and im old..)it was but it used die as next the GPU up and with very easy OC your could match the speeds of said high tear GPU so AMD capped it with a hard lock in the driver.

my GPU as benched at 3100mhz / 2870mhz in the passed, ever loading that save file results in 2950mhz / 2820mhz
Mine seems unchanged with Adrenalin 25.4.1. it goes to just above 3ghz in very demanding titles. That is with +10% pl and -85mv(-100mv and it crashes the driver, always done this since release driver). Havent messed to much with it though since getting the card..
 
Mine seems unchanged with Adrenalin 25.4.1. it goes to just above 3ghz in very demanding titles. That is with +10% pl and -85mv(-100mv and it crashes the driver, always done this since release driver). Havent messed to much with it though since getting the card..
my GPU would crash when benching at -115(about 3160mhz) today i manage -140 but the clocks would not pass 2950mzh so i suppose 3ghz, but it use to bench at 3.1ghz and would spike to 3.3ghz but never hold it for long.

my ram is a good example, if i set 2880mhz it will run at 2820.. but now i can run 2820 and fast timings, before i couldn't.. but i did a 1st place time spy run at 2880mhz
Heaven is average 3260 and high voltage.
ill try and run heaven to see what happens with the clocks


ive seen recently, somthing i mentions right at the start of this thread, about bios flashing to unlock the 9070xt power limit and clocks like we use to on old cards, well a very recently a few videos have popped up with people doing this and BAM my card is now locked to 2950mhz...

EDIT it was the 5600 and 5600xt the none XT would run at and passed the clocks of a 5600xt and AMD bios locked ti the 50mhz under the speed of a stock 5600xt
 
Last edited:

Afternoon all. I picked up a Gigabyte AORUS Radeon RX 9070 XT Elite just over a week ago, and it's been a pretty good upgrade for my Ultrawide gaming. The first thing I did with it on my PC was run Furmark 2 and it was all good for about 30 minutes. Since then, I've had one minor issue with it.

Thats why some people say dont use Furmark.
 
My gigabyte 9070 xt oc seems to do what it wants regarding fan speed and power draw and clocks, is this correct?
hwmonitor reports maximum of 401w, I looked at gigabytes control centre software and that dont even report correctly
 
Back
Top Bottom