• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

The Radeon RX9070XT / RX9070 Owners Thread

The Asgard said:
Which card do you have?
Click to expand...
nitro+.. just tinkering with it at mo doing a timespy run..got power +10%, undervolt -110 at mo...it's nearly finished and can hear the fans spin up now (lower sound of wind), but no coil whine. When I've been gaming (new card so haven't done massive amount), I haven't heard the card at all...though was running stock
 
welshrat said:
Same
Click to expand...
The cards in my case now and still pretty noisy. I can just tolerate it at 75Hz. My monitor is a 120/240Hz screen which I run at 120 and its very distracting, much louder than the fans underload. I have adjusted the tunning settings and its made no difference so this will be going back. I'm going to order another and hope for the best.
 
been a touch busy and yet to worry about overclocking and undervolting ect but was watching the clocks today and at stock speed the Hellhound was boosting to 3,
3200-3280 Mhz I did spot it go to 3350 acouple of times
 
The Asgard said:
The cards in my case now and still pretty noisy. I can just tolerate it at 75Hz. My monitor is a 120/240Hz screen which I run at 120 and its very distracting, much louder than the fans underload. I have adjusted the tunning settings and its made no difference so this will be going back. I'm going to order another and hope for the best.
Click to expand...
thats really not right
 
The Asgard said:
The cards in my case now and still pretty noisy. I can just tolerate it at 75Hz. My monitor is a 120/240Hz screen which I run at 120 and its very distracting, much louder than the fans underload. I have adjusted the tunning settings and its made no difference so this will be going back. I'm going to order another and hope for the best.
Click to expand...
Yeah that doesn't sound right. I ran the monster hunter benchmark and have been playing stalker 2 with GPU at 100% usage and can't hear any coil whine
 
Isn't that at least 2? people now with noisy Nitro+'s, considering it's ment to be the premium model it's a little disappointing.

In other news, coming from an eternal NVIDIA user, the image quality on AMD is far superior to my eyes, and I know it's not the best example but warzone/BO6 have never looked so good, they are like new games. Maybe it's FSR4, I dunno, but everything just seems better balanced and you can see spot things/people much more clearly.
Also the fact that I can run warzone at 120 fps (CPU limited) and it pulls only 90w is crazy.
 
Last edited:
Rup said:
I can see some of you really enjoy the minutia of over-clocking, good luck to you.
I just pressed the efficency button and left it there. Works in all my games, no crashes, maybe 2-3% fps difference, doubt most will notice.
Click to expand...
tbh, I'm tinkering for the 1st time, with a new card and being so much better than the last, I'm curious about it....I'm just viewing it as a game, though a different type of game where the end score is the fun part as you're playing with the product (the physical gpu), rather than playing with the output of the product(ie the actual game the gpu is outputting)...on my laptop doing this while the benchmarks runs and watching a bit of yt on the side also. Playing the games is fun, but doing this is fun also...I mean I'm 53 and still love building lego. Just something else to keep the mind active:cry:...seeing as my hand/eye coordination are through the floor now and my boys trounce me at online gaming

so my stock test had score 22,749, cpu 10059, gpu 29264
and test so far where I'm actually writing down my results....
with -100 undervolt score 25,448, cpu 13082, gpu 30543
with -105 undervolt score 25,464, cpu 13,023, gpu 30628...best score so far so 11.9% overall score increase from my base, 29.4% cpu increase, 4.6% on gpu
with -110 undervolt score 25,391, cpu 12964, gpu 30562
with -115 undervolt score 25,416, cpu 13099, gpu 30474
as far as I've got so far..running -120 at mo..will keep going till it crashed just to see

when I come to gaming, at mo I'll probably keep the card at stock as my games running flawless without problem for me...after tinkering with benchmarks etc, might run a game with the best settings I have just to see the difference in fps is, but unless I know it def doesn't stress the gpu and lower it's life expectancy, stock is fine for me (will try your efficiency also to see difference too)....any expert reading this can enlighten me on the last part?
 
Last edited:
YoungBlood said:
Isn't that at least 2? people now with noisy Nitro+'s, considering it's ment to be the premium model it's a little disappointing.

In other news, coming from an eternal NVIDIA user, the image quality on AMD is far superior to my eyes, and I know it's not the best example but warzone/BO6 have never looked so good, they are like new games. Maybe it's FSR4, I dunno, but everything just seems better balanced and you can see spot things/people much more clearly.
Also the fact that I can run warzone at 120 fps (CPU limited) and it pulls only 90w is crazy.
Click to expand...
are you running the sharpening tool ?
 
welshrat said:
Yeah that doesn't sound right. I ran the monster hunter benchmark and have been playing stalker 2 with GPU at 100% usage and can't hear any coil whine
Click to expand...
It’s good to know, which is why I’m going to give it another go and order a new one.
 
YoungBlood said:
Isn't that at least 2? people now with noisy Nitro+'s, considering it's ment to be the premium model it's a little disappointing.

In other news, coming from an eternal NVIDIA user, the image quality on AMD is far superior to my eyes, and I know it's not the best example but warzone/BO6 have never looked so good, they are like new games. Maybe it's FSR4, I dunno, but everything just seems better balanced and you can see spot things/people much more clearly.
Also the fact that I can run warzone at 120 fps (CPU limited) and it pulls only 90w is crazy.
Click to expand...

I found that too, you're also not the first to say this, not by a long way and you're probably not going to be the last.

I don't know why this is but Nvidia use a lot of software tricks to manipulate what the card is rendering to get the performance up, i don't wish to fire any shots here but perhaps its not quite the way its meant to be played.
 
This is running warzone at 120fps 3440x1440. Going to appreciate that power draw in the summer months hehe.

imgur.com

imgur.com

Discover the magic of the internet at Imgur, a community powered entertainment destination. Lift your spirits with funny jokes, trending memes, entertaining gifs, inspiring stories, viral videos, and so much more from users.
imgur.com imgur.com

Only downside is my 3900XT CPU is a massive massive bottleneck now.
 
WARburton said:
if you dont need the cores grab a 5700x3d for a massive upgrade
Click to expand...

5700X3D isn't on here but its around the 245K / 12700K / 12900K ball park here, that makes it about 40% faster than your 3900X for an easy and cheap drop in upgrade.

heQ00zs.png
 
Last edited:
Academic for the time being due to stock availability but what sort of power supply rating is consider the floor for these cards (i'd be pairing it with a 13600k). Just wondering if the 750 gold i have will cut it under load. The 3060ti i have at the moment is obviously no problem.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom