And this is why websites with performance Graphs will never be good for viewing a games performance. Can we all agree graphs are rubbish?
https://youtu.be/Xrt8DJ9G-dk?t=642
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
***The Random GPU related Video Thread***
- Thread starter shankly1985
- Start date
And this is why websites with performance Graphs will never be good for viewing a games performance. Can we all agree graphs are rubbish?
https://youtu.be/Xrt8DJ9G-dk?t=642
Totally agree, although recording can take a hit on the performance, I think it's far better to see 30 secs of gameplay with cpu/gpu stats/fps/frametimes, than some graphs of min max averg.
As always though multiplayer will always be a case of average/general expected performance, due to the many variables which can affect performance.
As to Anthem, oh dear not impressed at all.
As always though multiplayer will always be a case of average/general expected performance, due to the many variables which can affect performance.
As to Anthem, oh dear not impressed at all.
If it's done by a professional channel then they will use external recording hardware rather than software.
Yeah definitely which is why I have always followed Df.
Caporegime
I like this thread...
*Subbed*
*Subbed*
Caporegime
Puts a dampener on having an all AMD system lol.
Nothing we didn't already know tbh Intel still wins when it comes to gaming alone. The 2700k is cheaper CPU that still holds up very well.
Another very well PC optimised title! Do we all just love it when AMD is behind a game
Smooth Frame latency all around.
This video from Battle non sense really does explain what I been seeing lately for AMD and Nvidia vs Frame times! What ever the case might be it would seem this video effects Nvidia users the most. I basing this all on the benchmark videos I have seen lately and now his video also.
Before the work around he shows the frame times and they are quite bad like I have seen in a lot of benchmarks videos.
Here is frame times from my VEGA 64 with and without Radeon Chill = Smooth flat line!
With Chill
Without Chill
Before the work around he shows the frame times and they are quite bad like I have seen in a lot of benchmarks videos.
Here is frame times from my VEGA 64 with and without Radeon Chill = Smooth flat line!
With Chill
Without Chill
What settings do you use for chill @shankly1985
I set mine to 135 min and max. This keeps my frame rate within Freesync window.
O Tech Of Tomorrow LOL This made me laugh. It's bloody awful and catchy at the same time Haaaa
A....M....D
A....M....D
Wasn't expecting the 5700XT 4k performance to be this close.
Caporegime
BFV: 49 - 59 (+20%)
Detroit Become Human: 56 - 60 (+7%)
Call of Duty: Warzone: 61 - 66 (+8%)
Forza Horizon 4: 80 - 93 (+16%)
Hitman 2: 57 - 67 (+17%)
Red Dead Redemption 2: 33 - 39 (+18%)
Metro Exodus: 49 - 61 (+25%)
Assassin's Creed Odyssey: 38 - 46 (+20%)
PUBG: 47 - 65 (+38%)
2080 Super vs 5700XT: Average: +18%
Yeah, the 5700XT does pretty well. If its gained 10% with later drivers since release it would make sense, the 2080 Super is 27% faster at 4K in this review in which the 5700XT is on 19.10.1 WHQL drivers, October 2019.
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/powercolor-radeon-rx-5600-xt-red-devil/27.html