These sort of threads come up periodically, at the end of the day it's all massively variable, someone might be ploughing £30k a year into a pension so their 'expendable' income is lower than someone with a lower salary, but that's a choice they've made, and in future they can potentially draw down on that investment.I'm more interested in what people's expendable income is after all bills? It would be interesting to see the differences between:
£25k
£50k
£100k
People have different mortgage terms for example, the last time I remortgaged we took a 7 year term, had we taken say a 25 year term then before we paid it off we'd have more 'expendable' income each month due lower monthly repayments but that would be a bit of a fallacy as it ignores the fact that we reached a point where the mortgage was paid off and suddenly in the future bills drop drastically and 'expendable' income shoots up.
I guess what I'm saying is, such comparisons between people are never like-for-like and whilst it might pique a bit of curiousity ultimately a headline number of "I have £xxxx left after bills" doesn't really mean much against someone saying "I have £xxx left after bills", the person with £xxx left after bills might be better off overall.