• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

The Shadow of Mordor Bench.

Associate
Joined
24 Jun 2015
Posts
82
in my opinion my bench blast the fury and the 980ti and the titan x out of the water . I paid £230 for a brand new 980 strix from overclockers
 
Caporegime
Joined
24 Sep 2008
Posts
38,322
Location
Essex innit!
4096x2160 ,I5 4460, ASUS STRIX 980 OC 1500+ 8GHZ RAM ,1866 MHZ 8GB DDR3 . 353 DRIVERS

wuhft8K.png

in my opinion my bench blast the fury and the 980ti and the titan x out of the water . I paid £230 for a brand new 980 strix from overclockers

Did you follow the settings in the first post of this thread? Your score also looks too high for the card.
 
Man of Honour
OP
Joined
21 May 2012
Posts
31,940
Location
Dalek flagship
I think for now I will use results using the standard CF or SLI profiles for the tables.

I will think about having a separate table for AFR results.

I have seen some very strange things myself in the past when using AFR with my 290Xs.
 
Caporegime
Joined
12 Jul 2007
Posts
40,522
Location
United Kingdom
5960X @4.9Ghz
1/2/3/4 Fury X
2160P
15.7
Stock AMD SOM Profile

G8w34YH.jpg

F4e2HRt.jpg

XbtxBGR.jpg


1xFury X @1125/500

27wug51.png


2xFury X @1115/500

JpJYgum.png


3xFury X @1050/500

DRpToiO.png


4xFury X @1050/500

PNFhjFW.png

Using the stock AMD SOM profile means my four way score is cpu bottlenecked.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom