• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

The Shadow of Mordor Bench.

4096x2160 ,I5 4460, ASUS STRIX 980 OC 1500+ 8GHZ RAM ,1866 MHZ 8GB DDR3 . 353 DRIVERS

wuhft8K.png
 
in my opinion my bench blast the fury and the 980ti and the titan x out of the water . I paid £230 for a brand new 980 strix from overclockers
 
4096x2160 ,I5 4460, ASUS STRIX 980 OC 1500+ 8GHZ RAM ,1866 MHZ 8GB DDR3 . 353 DRIVERS

wuhft8K.png

in my opinion my bench blast the fury and the 980ti and the titan x out of the water . I paid £230 for a brand new 980 strix from overclockers

Did you follow the settings in the first post of this thread? Your score also looks too high for the card.
 
I think for now I will use results using the standard CF or SLI profiles for the tables.

I will think about having a separate table for AFR results.

I have seen some very strange things myself in the past when using AFR with my 290Xs.
 
4096x2160 ,I5 4460, ASUS STRIX 980 OC 1500+ 8GHZ RAM ,1866 MHZ 8GB DDR3 . 353 DRIVERS

wuhft8K.png

Most people are probably calling "UHD" 4K (when it's not really). You've used actual 4K so shouldn't be classed with the other 4K results.
If you can run it at 3840x2160 then it'll be easier to compare with the other scores.
 
2160p
5960X @4.5
353.30 drivers

2 x TitanXs @1455/2002
25lYpgv.jpg


3 x TitanXs @1442/2002
eSLow0A.jpg


4 x TitanXs @1442/2002
XSkC6U2.jpg
 
5960X @4.9Ghz
1/2/3/4 Fury X
2160P
15.7
Stock AMD SOM Profile

G8w34YH.jpg

F4e2HRt.jpg

XbtxBGR.jpg


1xFury X @1125/500

27wug51.png


2xFury X @1115/500

JpJYgum.png


3xFury X @1050/500

DRpToiO.png


4xFury X @1050/500

PNFhjFW.png

Using the stock AMD SOM profile means my four way score is cpu bottlenecked.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom