Like I said, it's a time slice but if people want to make claims using the worst kind of data available from it, there are better supported views which contradict it.
That's the point. They are a refresh and have gained reliability over the first take (2000 non super) which has worse RMA rates than AMDs first (and only so far) take on the 5000 top end.
By "new" I am referring to the initial models produced of a series. The ones that you'd expect to be taking the most risks to get performance.
Don't the newest Nvidia cards have the lowest RMA (20 Supers) they're the only cards that have been out same length of time as AMD's 5XXX?
That's the point. They are a refresh and have gained reliability over the first take (2000 non super) which has worse RMA rates than AMDs first (and only so far) take on the 5000 top end.
By "new" I am referring to the initial models produced of a series. The ones that you'd expect to be taking the most risks to get performance.
Last edited: