Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Exactly thisSince they took Nvidia's money i don't trust anything from them.
You didn't miss much, allegedly the entire EU got a stock drop of....12 cards.
Over the last few months AMD have had 2 launches and both have been complete *********, the 5 series cpu and the 6800 series gpu, looking to be 3 for 3 when the 6900xt drops.
Right now it looks like the majority of people that got one of these cpu's or gpus's are reviewers.
Exactly this
Are you guys implying the video is fake? Those are some serious accusations.
Nope, that’s not it
Denying the truth. The fear is real.
They also tested on an Intel i9 PCI-E Gen 3, then said the 6800 XT was not worthwhile due to bottlenecks at 1440p.It's not fake but it's obvious they was an Nvidia bias there. They failed to mention anything about AMD's upcoming answer to DLSS and just mislead the viewer by not even indicating that FidelityFXSR is in the works. Also they made a big thing out of 4K when we know most real gamers are playing at 1080P or 1440P high refresh rates. Common sense says that if you have a 144Hz monitor then look at the numbers at 1440P, not at 4K since you would be wasting your displays capability playing at only 60fps.
Are you guys implying the video is fake? Those are some serious accusations.
Nope, that’s not it
Denying the truth. The fear is real.
2x the RTX 2080.The Digital Foundry 6800/XT review had a very negative overall feel. Pretty much dismissing the 16GB VRAM advantage for instance. They also noted that going forward RT is going to be very important to games due to the consoles doing RT and because of that Nvidia would have a big advantage due to their better handling of RT. They seemed to not make the connection that RT will be optimized for console hardware (RDNA2) and not the way Nvidia does it. Nvidia may still have a RT advantage in this situation but RT should be very playable on the 6800 series cards due to this.
I don't know if they really are biased towards Nvidia but they sure were keen to take Nvidia's money to hype up the 3080 in their preview and that has left a sour taste in my mouth. I think I will stick to DFRetro going forward.
It's not fake but it's obvious they was an Nvidia bias there. They failed to mention anything about AMD's upcoming answer to DLSS and just mislead the viewer by not even indicating that FidelityFXSR is in the works. Also they made a big thing out of 4K when we know most real gamers are playing at 1080P or 1440P high refresh rates. Common sense says that if you have a 144Hz monitor then look at the numbers at 1440P, not at 4K.
Ok. Guess we already know how good / bad AMD’s ‘DLSS’ is both in image quality and performance. Also when it’s coming out!
Ouch that AMD RT performance... it stings.
Even without DLSS, with DLSS it’s completely game over man.
The Digital Foundry 6800/XT review had a very negative overall feel. Pretty much dismissing the 16GB VRAM advantage for instance. They also noted that going forward RT is going to be very important to games due to the consoles doing RT and because of that Nvidia would have a big advantage due to their better handling of RT. They seemed to not make the connection that RT will be optimized for console hardware (RDNA2) and not the way Nvidia does it. Nvidia may still have a RT advantage in this situation but RT should be very playable on the 6800 series cards due to this.
I don't know if they really are biased towards Nvidia but they sure were keen to take Nvidia's money to hype up the 3080 in their preview and that has left a sour taste in my mouth. I think I will stick to DFRetro going forward.
They also tested on an Intel i9 PCI-E Gen 3, then said the 6800 XT was not worthwhile due to bottlenecks at 1440p.
Anyone that tests high end GPUs on anything but the strongest CPU line-up (Ryzen 5000 series) and latest PCI-Gen (4.0) can get in the bin.
Why, i hear the people not interested in AMD GPUs cry that frequent this thread? Well, here's a CPU limited scenario - The fastest 3080 score in Firestrike Standard Vs the only 6080 XT graphics score. The difference in these scenario's? PCI-E 3.0 Vs 4.0. Granted, Ampere might be poor at 1080P-1440P, but running both on PCI-E Gen 4 would narrow the difference somewhat for sure.
This is the crazy thing, every other review has the 6800XT faster than the 3080, with any high end CPU, at 1440P, and say its a great card at that, compared with the 3080 it is, and there is nothing else you can compare it to.then said the 6800 XT was not worthwhile due to bottlenecks at 1440p.
I thought they were rather positive regarding the 6800 vs the 3070.
When you starting a thread on DLSS 3.0 @Grim5 ?![]()
Do they typically get allocated as soon as they're added to a basket, or does one have to normally complete the checkout before that happens?
Edit - £584 for an XT!!! Lucky sods that managed to bag that.
This is the crazy thing, every other review has the 6800XT faster than the 3080, with any high end CPU, at 1440P, and say its a great card at that, compared with the 3080 it is, and there is nothing else you can compare it to.
Along comes Digital Foundry and says exactly the opposite, like UserBench who have now given up trying to fudge the way they weigh CPU's because Ryzen 5000 is faster than Intel in every aspect are just blatantly shuffling all the Intel CPU's with lower scores above Ryzen 5000 in the performance charts and hope no one questions it..
Digital Foundry like Nvidia's money more than their integrity, that's fine, but i'm going to treat them accordingly, they are Nvidia shills. They are to Nvidia what UserBench are to Intel, a marketing arm parading as an independent reviewer.