[TW]Fox;19004413 said:
To be fair that would be the case if you were a retailer - as its £500 over the retail value. You are not, so its about £1k over.
I still find it hard to believe that retail value is only £3000 on the dot, I'll be sure to check that later. But irrespective of that, based on the current private market, £3k is perfectly realistic given the condition etc. Let's be fair, my car is far from the typical condition of a 137k mile car, something Glass's guide will never account for, especially not on a French hot hatch!
[TW]Fox;19004413 said:
I beleive the original disputed claim was about accelerating to well in excess of 100mph and then slowing for a roundabout, not only doing 100mph?
Well the Video showed ~120-navigating round about on the way up and 100-0 in around half - two thirds of it, on the way down - in excess of 100mph is possible
[TW]Fox;19004413 said:
Again, this doesnt seem to mirror what happened there either? I dont think the argument there was you saying you prefered your ST, it was you claiming the ST was faster or something. I'd prefer an ST to an Impreza as well so there must have been more to it than simply that..
IIRC, The argument started off people couldn't comprehend me not liking the Impreza then it moved on to discussions of in gear times when I said the ST felt faster - the conclusion after many pages was that a mapped ST was close to the in-gear times of a PPP.
[TW]Fox;19004413 said:
You forget that one of your tendancies on here which leads to huge threads is to make outrageously silly claims and then over the course of the next 6 pages, backtrack sufficiently that the point you end up making is infact half reasonable. Then you look back on your eventual reasonable point and think 'Why do they argue with me'.
This is your interpretation, which may have been the case early on, but as time went on, I was more and more careful with being thorough, dotting the Is and crossing the Ts.
This thread? Has been based on petty crap from the start, whether it was a tyre, or the fact a few people think it's overpriced (a few thought it was reasonable, too - they were ignored).
Head over to cliosport.net for feedback!
The trouble is, I'm likely to hit the same response over there as I've had from Clio owners on here - no one likes to be told their car isn't very good, even if it's just for one person's applications.
I also suspect it'll be littered with 'Well duh, why fit harder suspension then' from people that don't quite understand the issue/suspension. I guess it was more a case of I couldn't be bothered, perhaps I'll give it a go and see anyway.