I can see how the short bursts in the program could give some benefits but I'm far from convinced that it's better for you than doing 3-5 hours or reasonable intensity exercise.
I do 45 minutes of cardio each day (run 5km then either cycle or row) and 15 minutes of weights/pushups/etc and I've been doing that for 3 months with a weight loss of about 13kg and a noticeable increase in fitness.
I struggle to see how the 3 minutes of high intensity exercise would achieve the same health benefits even if it's better than doing nothing and I think it's a bit misleading to suggest that a decent exercise regime isn't both better and achievable. It feels a bit like they are telling people what they want to hear (i.e. you can feel justified laughing at idiots who go to the gym religiously because for 3 minutes each week you can be just as healthy).
Don't get me wrong, I think HIIT has some real benefits and I work it into my own routine but it's very much part of it rather than all of it. Would certainly be interested to hear from anyone who has a proper understanding of this though!
I do 45 minutes of cardio each day (run 5km then either cycle or row) and 15 minutes of weights/pushups/etc and I've been doing that for 3 months with a weight loss of about 13kg and a noticeable increase in fitness.
I struggle to see how the 3 minutes of high intensity exercise would achieve the same health benefits even if it's better than doing nothing and I think it's a bit misleading to suggest that a decent exercise regime isn't both better and achievable. It feels a bit like they are telling people what they want to hear (i.e. you can feel justified laughing at idiots who go to the gym religiously because for 3 minutes each week you can be just as healthy).
Don't get me wrong, I think HIIT has some real benefits and I work it into my own routine but it's very much part of it rather than all of it. Would certainly be interested to hear from anyone who has a proper understanding of this though!