• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Poll: The Vega Review Thread.

What do we think about Vega?

  • What has AMD been doing for the past 1-2 years?

  • It consumes how many watts and is how loud!!!

  • It is not that bad.

  • Want to buy but put off by pricing and warranty.

  • I will be buying one for sure (I own a Freesync monitor so have little choice).

  • Better red than dead.

Results are only viewable after voting.
Last edited:
Last edited:
Review Videos 1


Adored TV


Bit Wit


Blunty


Digital Foundary


Digital Foundary


Gamers Nexus


Hardware Unboxed


Hardware Unboxed


Joker Productions


Joker Productions




​
 
Last edited:
I never thought this review thread would reach 44 pages.

Having said that I do like the look and style of the new Vega cards, something that AMD have improved a lot compared to older cards like the 290X.:)
 
Boomstick777 said:
£300 for V56 and £500 for V64 would have been ideal for the base cards (Extra for Liquid coooling). I imagine will be a long time before we see it.

Some of Nvidia's GPU's are more expensive now then they were at launch (Last year)

It's a sign of the times.. Let AMD make some money. Their next lot of cards can be even better then.
Click to expand...


Future Vega 64 owner spotted ^^^

:D:D:D:D
 
Panos said:
First time over the last 20 years, I see people trying to ignore the price of a product and base it on it's performance. But well, each on their own.
However seeing your graph, which you take like a gospel, thought something is wrong, and my memory did serve me well at the end.

Thats Hexus, used the same CPU/mobo/ram just a month ago to do the review of the TitanXp.

7b6dcf7e-e6da-4c05-9d04-fb90634f1280.png


Huh, what happened? Did 1080tis lost 10% performance in a month to make the Vega review look better?
Or that 38mhz between Aorus Xtreme and EVGA SC2 is the major factor for 10% fps drop?

Lets pick an AMD sponsored game.
From the Vega review.
1dee4f6d-bca8-45d8-b470-1e13d32fbccc.png


From the TXp review same story.
Look at the FuryX performance. Having one myself, didn't saw a 4% drop on FPS in TWW the last 20 days.
803236fa-972f-4022-b711-97aee6728b90.png



The whole reason of my post, isn't another Vega or NV. But that reviews need to be researched over a period to make a decision.

Especially one which involves buying an overpriced card.

And again each on their own.
Click to expand...

A Titan Xp is not going to score less than an ordinary Pascal Titan in anything.
 
Panos said:
And the FuryX



I don't disagree. Wish i justify it's cost and buy one myself.
Click to expand...


Could not be bothered to fire up a Titan Xp so just used an ordinary Titan P.

Same settings as Hexus

Pascal Titan stock clocks

6950X @4.0 (Hexus had an advantage as they had their CPU @4.4)

4hfJe32.jpg

Goodness knows how they do their reviews as my score is quite a bit higher than theirs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom