For a minute there I thought you was talking about English history but then I remembered this film isn't about white people.
History is history, so you want history segregated as well as being rewritten.
For a minute there I thought you was talking about English history but then I remembered this film isn't about white people.
History is history, so you want history segregated as well as being rewritten.
Its a freaking film.
That's meant to be based on real events, that's how they advertised the film. If they want to make a fantasy / alternate reality film, then just do that, and nobody would care!!
She did a documentary (channel 4 I think) about the warrior Women of the region, it was in that she found out about the actual history of Dahomey and then pulled out upon learning the 'truth'. The documentary itself is actually pretty good.Ah, this was the film Lupita Nyong'o originally signed up for then left when she started reading about the actual history.
Its a freaking film.
so exceptional that a handful of French slaughtered them at a rate of 1:125 when the Dahomey attacked...“the most exceptional female warriors to ever live.”
What's a bunch of cannabis? Something else on your mind?Why didn't they just make it original.
Pretending is based on real events, when in reality they seemed to be a bunch of cannabis that were fully invested in the slave trade....
Weird choice.
I don't think I'm too bothered about seeing it until it comes to streaming.
Why didn't they just make it original.
Pretending is based on real events, when in reality they seemed to be a bunch of cannabis that were fully invested in the slave trade....
Weird choice. I think they missed an opportunity tbh.
I don't think I'm too bothered about seeing it until it comes to streaming.
Lol brilliantWhat's a bunch of cannabis? Something else on your mind?
Because it's new? Because we are discussing this film? Start a thread on films that claim historical accuracy but are actually the opposite, i guess if you waNna discuss them. What's your favourite "historical" film.There's about 1000 movies "based on real events" or "inspired by real events" that are total ********, so I'm not sure why this movie is being single out.
Actually I am sure, that's blatantly obvious.
In the film, Nanisca confronts Ghezo about the immorality of selling black slaves to the Portuguese and suggests trading in palm oil production instead. While this conversation is fictional, it is based on the historic fact that the Agojie favored trading palm oil with the Europeans between 1840 to 1870. Whether they considered it immoral is unclear, especially given their history of participating in slave raids. Slavery in Dahomey persisted after the British Empire stopped Dahomey from continuing in the Atlantic slave trade. The British Empire's Royal Navy successfully blockaded Dahomey's slave-trading in the 1840s, which led to Dahomey's two political parties becoming polarized about what to trade.
yes, it's the thread for the movie.. If you want to laugh at other films that claim to be historical epics then go make a thread about them and we'll join you.There's about 1000 movies "based on real events" or "inspired by real events" that are total ********, so I'm not sure why this movie is being single out.
Actually I am sure, that's blatantly obvious.
so I'm not sure why this movie is being single out.
And as usual, you attempt to wave away any criticism when it comes to anything featuring 'strong women' or non-white people - often by playing a subtle or not so subtle 'you're just racist/misogynistic' card. See below for yet another example.I was the one who kick-started the thread again! Nobody was that bothered.
Suddenly you all want to discuss how it's not factual.
There's about 1000 movies "based on real events" or "inspired by real events" that are total ********, so I'm not sure why this movie is being single out.
Actually I am sure, that's blatantly obvious.
I was the one who kick-started the thread again! Nobody was that bothered.
Suddenly you all want to discuss how it's not factual.