Think I annoyed my neighbour

Tefal said:
But if you only get a speeding ticket if you actually crash/hit someone etc then it's pointless.


It's there so you don;t speed, because even if you think it's safe if someone does run out in front of you unexpectedly, if you where doing 30 and you hit them they have a much greater chance of survival than if you hit them at 40+ (something like an extra 80% chance to not die)

If someone else crosses the line falls asleep etc and hits you if your doing the lower legal limit you're both more likely to live, than if you are speeding even if you do nothing else wrong.
Click to expand...

Ah, no, I'm not talking in 30 zones, I never speed in 30s, 40s, or even 50s. I've only ever sped on empty dual carriageways or motorways, when you can see there's nothing ahead of you, nothing could possibly happen to hurt anyone else etc etc.

Like a tree falling in a forest, does it make a sound if no one's around to hear it?
 
Dingo said:
So you had from 7-10 to do the job and you did it at 10?..........I would have come and give you a few whacks and see if you minded at that time of night!!
Click to expand...

have the first :rolleyes: of the month.

You're acting like a jack ass if you go out and hit him rather than just politly tell im to keep the noise down.

But then again common sense and decency* aren't really worth it are they when you can act like the big hard man.

*now you're going to say something like "well he wasn't decent to me was he wah wah wah" And you're right he was in the wrong however starting a fight over it (especially when he has a wrench) is hardly the civilized and mature thing to do. You should solve it with words not your keyboard, after all you're the one who will end up with a wrench to the head and the charge for assault.

And people blame the state of the nation on "chavs" and dole scroungers, when it's them and their attitude of "i'd come smak you one , cause I'm ard aren't i!" So much for the good old British manners and stiff upper lip.

Good day!
 
Tefal said:
have the first :rolleyes: of the month.

You're acting like a jack ass if you go out and hit him rather than just politly tell im to keep the noise down.

But then again common sense and decency* aren't really worth it are they when you can act like the big hard man.

*now you're going to say something like "well he wasn't decent to me was he wah wah wah" And you're right he was in the wrong however starting a fight over it (especially when he has a wrench) is hardly the civilized and mature thing to do. You should solve it with words not your keyboard, after all you're the one who will end up with a wrench to the head and the charge for assault.

And people blame the state of the nation on "chavs" and dole scroungers, when it's them and their attitude of "i'd come smak you one , cause I'm ard aren't i!" So much for the good old British manners and stiff upper lip.

Good day!
Click to expand...

I take it you haven't seen his keyboard then?, it's an aluminiumised level 60 with health and mana upgrades!
 
Tefal said:
Snip
Click to expand...

And as Tom has said it doesn't take hours to fix and, if he was a considerate neighbour, he would have talked to her in the first place and informed her of the situation, or done the job at the weekend.

He knew the job needed doing so why not do it at 7pm?.....probably because it wasn't convenient for him and sod the neighbours, because this modern Society tells us we can all do what we want, when we want, and there should be no consequence.........because of our "Human Rights"......and sod everyone else because the "ME" comes before the "WE".

It's not about "acting the hard man", and shame on you for "assuming", because we all know how that ends up don't we.

I don't need aluminium keyboards gents.....I am intelligent, articulate,well read and have held a Senior management position for more years than I care to remember (and am also 6' 4", 220lbs)........but I'm also a mean *****r who won't take no s*** from numpty's who couldn't care less about anybody but themselves and post on forums saying "WTF.....my neighbour is so Gross for complaining whilst I am being an A******e, dudes, what is the world coming to".


And then for them to get "Oh man, people can be so unreasonable, why shouldn't you wake up half the street at 10pm if your brakes need fixing, contact your MP and have the B**** removed from the street" replies.

He had several options.....7-10 or early am 5-8.....and the chance to communicate at all stages, instead he chose to please himself and do what was convenient for him.

Anyone supporting him in this thread is also a "self pleaser"



Alan, deep breath, you disappoint me beyond words, but pink is such a lovely colour isn't it!!
 
Dingo said:
It's not about "acting the hard man", and shame on you for "assuming", because we all know how that ends up don't we.
Click to expand...

I would have come and give you a few whacks and see if you minded at that time of night!!
Click to expand...

You're right thats clearly reasoned and sensible debate, and i never said he wasn;lt in the wrong just you're being a tard for saying you'd whack him for it.


care to remember (and am also 6' 4", 220lbs)........but I'm also a mean *****r who won't take no s*** from numpty's
Click to expand...

Again I was so clearly wrong in in the observation that you where trying to play the big internet hard man, alow me and my 5' 11 10 stone to flee flee to the hills.
 
Tefal said:



Come on tom we can take 'em!
Click to expand...

Where did you get that P**** picture from......has to be a Northern thing right.

Just stating the obvious, and interesting that you focused on the negative (ie) pre-determined to equivocate you arguement\point of view.

Now focus on HIS behaviour, HIS attitudes and HIS perceptions and truthfully, tell me if he is right??
 
Dingo said:
Where did you get that P**** picture from......has to be a Northern thing right.

Just stating the obvious, and interesting that you focused on the negative (i.e.) pre-determined to equivocate you argument\point of view.

Now focus on HIS behaviour, HIS attitudes and HIS perceptions and truthfully, tell me if he is right??
Click to expand...


I got it from google, and I must admit I am at loss as to what the censored word is.
that P**** picture
Click to expand...


Just stating the obvious, and interesting that you focused on the negative (i.e.) pre-determined to equivocate you argument\point of view.
Click to expand...


Firstly this is horribly worded (not just from a grammatical point of view which I don't really care about) but from the fact it sounds ugly, (for want of a better word) and awkward.

But from it I presume you are talking about how after you said
"I'm not trying to be a hard man"
Click to expand...

I quoted a few of your words where you speak of your physical prowess and violent intentions, and how I ignored your management position, and how you are intelligent and articulate (another of your statements we have found to be at fault it seems).

Now I chose these sections to highlight as my point was not, "it is wrong to be annoyed or to confront him" no my point is that if you are going to it should be done in a polite and civilised manner, just because he has been inconsiderate does not mean we all have to stoop to the same level (although physical threats and violence are unarguably more deplorable), does it?

If you cared to read my posts, and applied your obviously stunning intellect, you would see that I have already gave my opinion and an example about how he could have handled the situation better and apologise.

But of course you being the "mean *****r" you are, I suppose you would find a sensible and non violent solution beneath you.
 
Tefal said:
I got it from google, and I must admit I am at loss as to what the censored word is.





Firstly this is horribly worded (not just from a grammatical point of view which I don't really care about) but from the fact it sounds ugly, (for want of a better word) and awkward.

But from it I presume you are talking about how after you said


I quoted a few of your words where you speak of your physical prowess and violent intentions, and how I ignored your management position, and how you are intelligent and articulate (another of your statements we have found to be at fault it seems).

Now I chose these sections to highlight as my point was not, "it is wrong to be annoyed or to confront him" no my point is that if you are going to it should be done in a polite and civilised manner, just because he has been inconsiderate does not mean we all have to stoop to the same level (although physical threats and violence are unarguably more deplorable), does it?

If you cared to read my posts, and applied your obviously stunning intellect, you would see that I have already gave my opinion and an example about how he could have handled the situation better and apologise.

But of course you being the "mean *****r" you are, I suppose you would find a sensible and non violent solution beneath you.
Click to expand...

read your own post matey.....don't criticise me when it appears your first language could barely be English given the grammatical and contradictary nature of your vocabulary.

And had you read my post properly you would have seen that I would have talked to him first............but you avoided the question of course.....It's never about stooping to another level, it's about bringing up the lowest common denominator to a standard, and whilst you "airy fairy" types continue to make effortless apologies for "poor behaviour", you only encourage that behaviour to proliferate.

I'll be sure to talk nicely to the next Terrorist that moves in next to me, after all, I wouldn't want to offend his sensibilities would I!!:(
 
So you had from 7-10 to do the job and you did it at 10?..........I would have come and give you a few whacks and see if you minded at that time of night!!
Click to expand...

Where did you try to talk to him, in that scenario?

Please do point out the contradictions in my post, I'm intrigued. As English is not my strong point I always find it interesting to know where I go wrong (I am aware I tend to over use brackets and comas, but I prefer the annotation.), or are you confusing sarcasm with true intention? I could label the sarcastic points if it would help you, although this may lessen the comedic impact.

But you must admit that

Just stating the obvious, and interesting that you focused on the negative (i.e.) pre-determined to equivocate you argument\point of view.
Click to expand...

makes very little sense and is difficult to discover what it relates to. Still no clues to the identity of the p word then?


I'll be sure to talk nicely to the next Terrorist that moves in next to me, after all, I wouldn't want to offend his sensibilities would I!!
Click to expand...

Well it would be a good Idea to talk politely to the man till the armed response unit arrives (that or get your family out of the area), But then thats the chance we take with manors isn't on day you're asking a man to please keep the nose down next terrorists are moving in. Much better to just bludgeon everybody, eh?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom