Poll: This Johnny Depp Stuff

[Chuk_Chuk]

Some of the stuff in the media is just completely off the rails like that Vogue opinion piece released recently

Why It’s Time To Believe Amber Heard

The British courts believed Johnny Depp beat his ex-wife. What’s stopping the rest of us?

www.vogue.co.uk

Evidence, you utter buffoon. Evidence stops the rest of us believing her.

From your link

And regardless of what Heard did or didn’t suffer at the hands of Depp, isn’t the relentless memeing of her a form of violence in itself? Is the pummelling by social media not a type of psychological assault? Are we not witnessing a modern-day witch trial?

So what JD went through a few years ago because of her

 

[aardvark]

Some of the stuff in the media is just completely off the rails like that Vogue opinion piece released recently

Why It’s Time To Believe Amber Heard

The British courts believed Johnny Depp beat his ex-wife. What’s stopping the rest of us?

www.vogue.co.uk

lol - these people are insane. They don't care about evidence or facts at all.

 

[Jokester]

Yep, sadly the mainstream media are still ignoring the weight of evidence that Heard abused Depp, regardless of whether Depp did or didn't abuse her.

E.g:

Rachel Riley says she ‘wouldn’t wish Johnny Depp on my worst enemy’

‘Countdown’ star shared her thoughts on the actor amid the ongoing defamation trial between Depp and ex-wife Amber Heard

www.google.com

This story focuses on Rachel Riley tweeting that she wouldn't wish Johnny Depp on her worst enemy. But it doesn't mention 90%+ of replies from the public were in support of Depp as a victim and against Heard as an abuser.

https://twitter.com/RachelRileyRR/status/1526952129289650178?t=CqevVXnriSJ0MPiA-JSshw&s=19

Did laugh when I read that, it basically came down to, I believe Amber because Johnny used to be friends with Marilyn Manson.

 

[dlockers]

MSM are just doing it for clicks.

 

[wolfie138]

Yep, sadly the mainstream media are still ignoring the weight of evidence that Heard abused Depp, regardless of whether Depp did or didn't abuse her.

E.g:

Rachel Riley says she ‘wouldn’t wish Johnny Depp on my worst enemy’

‘Countdown’ star shared her thoughts on the actor amid the ongoing defamation trial between Depp and ex-wife Amber Heard

www.google.com

This story focuses on Rachel Riley tweeting that she wouldn't wish Johnny Depp on her worst enemy. But it doesn't mention 90%+ of replies from the public were in support of Depp as a victim and against Heard as an abuser.

https://twitter.com/RachelRileyRR/status/1526952129289650178?t=CqevVXnriSJ0MPiA-JSshw&s=19

all the revelations of the trial and the only thing the BBC seems to report is an ex from 20 years ago, barkin, didn't like JD. they have their agenda so my agenda is now to stop paying my licence fee.

 

[Dogoid]

AH team have 8 hours left lol

 

[wolfie138]

Did laugh when I read that, it basically came down to, I believe Amber because Johnny used to be friends with Marilyn Manson.

and regarding the Manson accustations, guess what..

 

[Firestar_3x]

So unless this guy actually did the surgery on reattaching JDs finger then i'm not sure what this testimony brings.

 

[Dogoid]

That's an awful tie

 

[Hotwired]

I'm finding out that Rachel Riley is not quite what I thought.

 

[bris]

I'm finding out that Rachel Riley is not quite what I thought.

Some women are in denial that a woman could be an abuser, it's a male thing to them.

Riley will be on the losing side of this, she shouldn't have got involved.

Vogue are also in denial

 

[Terminal_Boy]

I almost feel sorry for Heard’s legal team. Almost.

 

[Dogoid]

Go girl

 

[Firestar_3x]

I love Camille's question pacing.

 

[james.miller]

There's defiantly something about Camille *hearteyes*

 

[Dogoid]

I thought he severed his finger smashing a wall mounted phone in Aus?

 

[Deleted User 234324]

Here comes the impeachment, watching another stream with a bunch of lawyers, their initial thoughts were, not the first time a expert has been paid hansomly to basically lie.

 

[Firestar_3x]

Here comes the impeachment, watching another stream with a bunch of lawyers, there initial thoughts were, not the first time a expert has been paid hansomly to basically lie.

He has also been used by AH on other cases, so he hardly looks impartial from the offset.

 

[tuftyfella]

the problem i have is how can he say anything with a consistant opinion when not know anything of the bottle thrown, weight, contents of bottle, angle it hit the finger, which part of the bottle hit his finger, was the bottle spinning at all, exact angle and position of the fingers etc etc

$5000 well spent lol

EDIT: oh and also, i think camille should have brought up AH's description of how she thinks JD hurt his hand smashing a phone against a wall and asked his opinionon that.

 

[Droolinggimp]

the problem i have is how can he say anything with a consistant opinion when not know anything of the bottle thrown, weight, contents of bottle, angle it hit the finger, which part of the bottle hit his finger, was the bottle spinning at all, exact angle and position of the fingers etc etc

$5000 well spent lol

EDIT: oh and also, i think camille should have brought up AH's description of how she thinks JD hurt his hand smashing a phone against a wall and asked his opinionon that.

No need to bring that up, waste of a 10minutes of their allotted remaining court time. It was all made clear and the answer she needed she got. That was all she needed to find out from him.
Thats why-

I love Camille's question pacing.

She goes straight to the point, no messing with going round the houses. She wants an answer and fires right to the questions that will get that answer.