Yeah I know shes had that look since the start but if you watch her face as JD is marking on the screen where he was sitting at the bar, theres a definite change at that point. She also did the same facial change when Depp said that he had only done MDMA 6 times in his life.
Poll: This Johnny Depp Stuff
- Thread starter Dirk Diggler
- Start date
Permabanned
- Joined
- 25 Oct 2004
- Posts
- 9,078
In the text about 3-4 lines from the bottom, he says "i cut the top of my middle finger off".
She is going to capitalise on that, even though we all know it was the bottle incident.
She is going to capitalise on that, even though we all know it was the bottle incident.
She's that narcissistic that she probably believes she's winning this.
Will definitely be interesting to watch her reaction when the verdict is given
Yeah, imagining her forthcoming career where her lines are about needing pipes cleaned and having to offer alternate payment.
Soldato
- Joined
- 16 May 2004
- Posts
- 6,874
- Location
- Derby
Donates and doesn't brag vs Brags and doesn't donate
Permabanned
- Joined
- 25 Oct 2004
- Posts
- 9,078
Soldato
- Joined
- 16 May 2004
- Posts
- 6,874
- Location
- Derby
good correction, thanks
Permabanned
- Joined
- 25 Oct 2004
- Posts
- 9,078
Not an ounce of empathy on her face. They are discussing the TMZ motion now. Hopefully they refuse it so the TMZ guy can testify.
Plenty of slap, and plastic. I swear she looks like a cardassian from star trek with those freaky cheeks implants.
Associate
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2008
- Posts
- 1,543
Anyone else notice Amber popping something into her mouth, seemingly pretending to pull papers from her bag, soon after JD takes the stand?
looks dodgy as ****.
looks dodgy as ****.
Permabanned
- Joined
- 25 Oct 2004
- Posts
- 9,078
Apparently Ben Chew (Depps lawyer) gave them a bowl of sweets at the beginning of the day. Sharing the candy, if you remember back to the testimony with doc brown, apparently people who eat in court are narcissists.
Their lawyer there now
I don't like this argument, I get the 1st amendment/protect sources thing but if TMZ has been sloppy with protecting their sources then that's on them surely not a court to mop up after them. Like if he wasn't the journalist directly involved but TMZ is so sloppy that many employees know about the source then that's their fault no, arguments about courts having to uphold confidential sources broadly seem a bit sus as surely TMZ has a responsibility to keep sources safe.
He's voluntarily prepared to testify that should be his right to do so, it's up to the media companies themselves to implement NDAs restrict access to details of sources surely.
He's voluntarily prepared to testify that should be his right to do so, it's up to the media companies themselves to implement NDAs restrict access to details of sources surely.
Permabanned
- Joined
- 25 Oct 2004
- Posts
- 9,078
Motion denied, if AH is named as the source of the videos, this case is over.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 11 Mar 2005
- Posts
- 32,221
- Location
- Leafy Cheshire
Even if not directly, as in AH passed the info to TMZ, i hope to god AH can linked to this.
Would be yet another massive hole in her case.
Would be yet another massive hole in her case.