Third Opinion said:...Or were about 15 years ago.
And old means bad yeh?
Third Opinion said:...Or were about 15 years ago.
Siliconslave said:they'll still hold their own against a lot of recent "hot" hatches tbh - just cause somethings old doesn't mean its rubish
agw_01 said:You know what this forum's like.
If it's older than 5 years and not a Ford/BMW, it's crap.
[TW]Fox said:
Third Opinion said:...Or were about 15 years ago.
It's like a Commodore 64. Blinding in their day but would you want to be sat behind one today?
Third Opinion said:...Or were about 15 years ago.
It's like a Commodore 64. Blinding in their day but would you want to be sat behind one today?[/QUOTE
Yes i would and i'm on my 4th 1.9 now.![]()
timbob said:205s are ace. Were it not for the fact that I wanted a newer and more reliable car to use for work, I would have had one.
I remember reading a quote not so long ago, I think it was in EVO magazine who said "When the 205GTi was released in 1986(?) it was considered the best hot hatch in the world. 20 years on, it pretty much still is." Nuff said.
Lt Goody said:In a recent evo magazine test they tested all the latest hot hatches against the old ones and the 205 gti came 4thmade me so proud.
![]()
Er, yeah actually.Third Opinion said:Blinding in their day but would you want to be sat behind one today?
It came 3rd m8 but the clio williams is my 2nd favourite hot hatch.MrMatteh said:was that where the williams came first?![]()
![]()
NickXX said:Dude, sort out those rub strips first![]()
Lopéz said:Rear beam has had it, or has been lowered in the past. "Had it" is more likely.
Do you have different profile tyres front and rear? The fronts look to be a higher profile.