[TW]Fox;10923871 said:
I think housemaster said something about the demographics of forums and how it changes a few weeks ago. It's interesting how the preffered tyre choices change over time, as a car ages and becomes more affordable. It cannot be a co-incidence that as this happens the preffered tyre amongst members becomes cheaper and cheaper and the cars become more available to people who wouldn't normally buy them (And before you all go off one, that includes me, 'cos I couldnt buy a 2 year old 5 Series).
Until you get right to the bottom, the Mondeo forums, where they all love remoulds on their Mk1's.
That's not necessarily true. I have Falkens on my car as they were recommended by the Cerb forums at PH. Most chaps on there seem to know about the running costs of a Cerb, most also seem to know about many other aspects of the car, and yet they still suggest the 452's
Maybe tyre recommendations change as a manufacturer brings out a new tyre which is better, or just as good but cheaper, than the current stock.
For a long time the F1 has been bandied about as the nuts, but in that time I've had F1's plus others on my cars, some of the same vehicle and I've found them to be mediocre in comparrison to some others.
I can't compare the 452's (I had the previous type, 451's? on the Jag) as I have them on the cerb and have had no other tyres on it yet, but I can compare Avon ZZ3's against the F1 GSD3 on a Saab and found the Avons to be better.
Others have had different experiences, I'm sure, and I suppose a lot depends on drive layout, geometry, car type, weight, power and so on. Even changing the damper settings can make a car feel more planted so deciding that a set of tyres are rubbish just because some kwik-fit fitter slapped them on your motor at the last MOT is not necessarily a bench mark.
Sadly tyres are quite expensive and it can take a lot of time and effort to test various tyres on your set up to find the best.