More anti-young policy from our gerontocracy.
Just absurd.
Just absurd.
Indeed. There's a not-insignificant chance the next move will be to extend the 30 year write-off to 40, too.They must want it to never be paid back.
******* hell.Hasn't that already been announced?
https://www.politics.co.uk/news/202...s-instead-of-30-in-higher-education-shake-up/
YOU'RE being disingenuous. Her tweet doesn't imply anything excessive, and even her example of how much in cash terms it will go up by is for a 6 month period at these rates.While I don't agree with the way the Gov is going about this... Zarah is being disingenuous as always. Her tweet implies it's going up to 9-12% and staying there
There are many actual examples of it just in this thread. It's not hyperboleSuch Hyperbolic nonsense.
That's not really true. Voting Tory is mostly predicated on wealth. That's why old people and high earning people vote more for Tories, as per the first post in this threadHighly educated people are more likely to be moderate or to the left than they are to the right. Can’t have too many highly educated people for that reason alone in the Tories eyes.
I don't think being highly paid counts as a penalty, tbh. And it's unhelpful to think of it as suchTheres also looking at it from the other angle. Those who do worthwhile degrees and end up with high paying jobs afterwards are doubly penalised
I'd be interested in any sources for that. Generally, C2DE votes a little more for Tory (but no more for Labour) than ABC1, but the 'E' portion is retirees, who vote so overwhelmingly Tory that it pollutes the grouping.I said highly educated, not rich. Especially those who have come from poverty or working class to become highly educated.