Trading the stockmarket (NO Referrals)

As someone who does this for a living (buy-analyst for a long only well established investment fund with a number of billions under management) I've followed this thread with interest - you never know what tips you might find! Seriously though, I'm interested in several things. I should say firstly that I don't mean to criticise anyone and I would advocate a keen interest in investments - just several observations I have picked up. I should qualify that I typically look at companies on a long term horizon (4 years), but there are many similarities.

(1) I assume all those that invest actively (i.e. not a simple tracker fund) believe the market is not efficient, i.e. that market prices do not accurately reflect the value of company. I would agree. Not all markets are efficient, and its clear you might expect to find greater inefficiency on smaller markets such as AIM vs. the FTSE where you have generally less coverage of the company.

(2) You must believe you have an edge over the market. It is worth noting that over history actively managed funds have underperformed passive index trackers by approx. 50bps (0.5%). This would suggest on average that I would do better to put my money in an index tracker than incur the fees of an actively managed fund, or the costs of my own personal trades. So my question would be, what makes you think you have an edge over the market? Unless, you can answer this convincingly to yourself then I would be very careful. If you expect positive news on a company, don't you think the market expects this too and isn't it already in the price as a result. The same goes for an investment reccommendation, etc.

(3) Learn to recognise luck and skill. Some say it is better to be lucky then good and it will probably result in better profits in investing. What I would say, however, is learn to be disciplined in recognising whether the profit/loss on a trade is a result of luck or your theory coming true. It will help you to avoid making the same mistakes over and over again.

(4) One comment I often see is people saying how in 200X you couldn't lose money and look at by XX% return. How do you measure your returns? Against what benchmark (FTSE, Mining, etc?) If you made a 30% return great, but if the market made a 40% return, then suddenly this doesn't sound quite so good.

(5) What analysis tools do you use, company financial reports, broker reports, news, industry sources, gut feel, etc.

(6) Remember if a stock loses 50% it doesn't have to gain 50% to get back to where it was before, it needs to gain 100% (double). Money lost can be very difficult to get back.


John


What got me intereted in shares of late was the BP saga, their share price has obvioulsy slumped beyond belief, the way i see it is that politics will govern their share price from now on, Obama & co could crush them if they wanted too and whatever has been written about America in the media, Britian are still the main ally to the USA (maybe the only ally) and as far as i am concerned that means a lot. So my reasoning is that the US will not let BP die off but will play some short term politics to look good in mean time, thus BP will regain their standing similar to how ExxonMobil did. This may take 5 -10 years plus but i see it as an investment, so yes to answer your question gut feeling governs my rationale regarding BP and maybe most shares. America, overall, ARE a fair and JUST country no matter what some say and i hope they will come good. So for me shares are not always about science, business or technology, they are about the fundamentals of all of us, trust, desire and belief as that is what drives the consumer market.
 
Completely different situation really.

The reason it is so low:
Liabilities unknown
Oil still leaking.
No dividend

Arguably, and obviously not including the oil bit, they were the same :p

Liabilities were unknown when it all crashed, and then dividends etc canned :) Although they also had that bailout thingy as well.

Just playing devils advocate, don't want anyone losing money they can't afford to.

People said this would never go below 300, it did today.
 
Only one person said it wouldnt go below 300p and I think that was to just convince themselves.

Banks have no assets - BP have billions, trillions even if you include oil in wells. They don't need a bailout and their profits from the rest of the business are not affected at all by this situation.

The dividend suspension was more of a gesture IMO
 
What got me intereted in shares of late was the BP saga, their share price has obvioulsy slumped beyond belief,..This may take 5 -10 years plus but i see it as an investment...

"beyond belief" means nothing, you just perceive a 50% fall as a lot.

"May take 5-10 years" you're subconsciously fooling yourself into a no matter what I'll win mindset.

I saw these type of comments on the newbie trading forums (yahoo etc) during the demise of Northern Rock. The drop from 1200p to 600p drew in thousands of "bargain" hunters, the further drop from 600p to 200p drew in even more. We all know how that ended. The same thing happened with Royal Bank and a number of others.

As posted earlier, if you're in it for the "long term" why not invest in a FTSE tracker? I suspect many here are in BP for the short term expecting 50%-100% gains. The stockmarket does not behave in the way the general public can relate to and thus many lose money.

In regards to BP:
I don't believe they're about to go bankrupt, but you have simply no way of knowing what the longer term effects will be. BP Global assets are ~£100b, £35b of which are BP America (worst case scenario it's BP America that will BK, not BP global), potential lawsuits and clean up bill are currently in the £30b range. The unknowns are the damage to the brand, long term lawsuits and structural change if they are found to be negligent (read this as lower profits).
 
The BP bankruptcy scare stories are made up by shorters.

In theory, when this sorry mess is all cleared up (in 5 years plus based on the $20bn fund), the leak is stopped and the fines are defined and paid, the dividend should return and the BP share price should return to previous levels.

The trouble is that the previous price included the earnings of the integrated AMOCO, and the possibility of further earnings potential in that part of the world.

Hayward and Svanberg haven't covered themselves in glory in their handling of this, and there is real danger that the US operations may never recover. At this stage I wouldn't rule out the de-merger of AMOCO and that kind of uncertainty about huge variables in future earnings, is as big a concern as the liabilities of the spill.

If I wasn't in so deep in Lloyds I might be tempted to have a flutter on BP, but I've got more than enough wounds to lick having watched a 12% drop in 2.5 days... :eek:
 
(6) Remember if a stock loses 50% it doesn't have to gain 50% to get back to where it was before, it needs to gain 100% (double). Money lost can be very difficult to get back.

That is a good point but the reason BP is not a duplicate of Northern Rock or other failed companies is


  • Less leverage, banks borrowed on their assets upto 40x

  • Banks used sub prime debt as some of their core asset worth, oil is BP's core asset and the price isnt falling or likely to

  • Sub prime was (is) a government backed falsely created market. Oil supply is affected by OPEC but the demand is not falsely inflated and appears to be growing in line with world gdp


BP screwed up no doubt, they have been failing in accident prevention for years. Long term I would recommend Shell rather then BP.

However its likely the market is overshooting as it often does and the companys total value has not halved
 
One of the flaws of private investing is people including myself dont often consider the bread and butter of the companys they buy.
They end up chasing prices, nobody here sits down 8 hours a day to consider earnings potential so like John says above the odds are biased to failure vs the professionals


I thought this explanation of earnings was pretty useful and fairly straightforward. Its detailing gold mining and the price of gold in relation to potential profit.

However I think we can substitute BP and the oil price in a similar way. Obviously BP expenses just rose a whole lot and still rising, how able are they to pay them though and what effect would $90 oil have or $50 even

goldminerexpenses.jpg

goldminerexpenses2.jpg





Had this sent to me today and remembered it being mentioned here -

Code:
   Buy Range Resources (RRL) at 4.875p

Says James Faulkner of specialist small cap website WatsHot.com

When it comes to oil and gas, the semi-autonomous Somali state of Puntland is perhaps most famous (or infamous) for the pirates which operate out of its ports. Ironically however, Somalia is understood to be sitting on vast hydrocarbon reserves of its own, which have hitherto been undeveloped due to political strife. The Puntland State of Somalia was established in August 1998 after a decision made by local political and traditional leaders following several failed national reconciliation efforts in the wake of the Somali Civil War.

[IMG]http://img683.imageshack.us/img683/1323/chartaspx.gif[/IMG]

 Whilst the rest of Somalia remains a very dangerous place, Puntland has largely managed to avoid internal conflict and civil strife (excepting a few isolated occurrences).

In a 1991 a World Bank coordinated study intended to encourage private investment in the petroleum potential of eight African nations, Somalia and the Sudan topped the list of potential commercial oil producers; and while Sudan is now a producer, primarily due to the relatively calmer political climate of that country in the last decade, Somalia's potential remains untapped. Before the Civil War, Somalia had been previously identified to possess all the requirements for a petroleum province. This view was further reinforced in the mid 1980s following the successful exploration efforts of Hunt Oil Corp across the Gulf of Aden in Yemen. There Hunt discovered multi-billion barrel oil reserves that their geologists believed were part of a great underground rift or valley that arced into and across northern Somalia. This led to a flurry of exploration activity by the majors during the late 1980s and early 1990s, which the Civil War brought to an abrupt halt in 1991.

20 new tips a year for as little as GBP73
T1ps.com offers 20 new meticulously researched tips a year plus frequent updates on all tipped stocks.
To get all of these for just GBP73 by direct debit or GBP87.60 by credit/debit card, join t1ps.com now.

Range has been able to obtain through Government sources previous exploration documentation relating to the hydrocarbon exploration in the Nogal Valley area in Puntland up until 1991. The documentation includes original seismic tapes, well logs and processed seismic sections identifying major targets found prior to exploration activities ceasing in Somalia. Range acquired the sole rights to to all mineral and hydrocarbon exploration and development in Puntland in July 2006. In October of the same year, Range signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Africa Oil regarding a $50 million 80% farm-in right for the latter in the Nogal Basin and Darin Basin Blocks. This has since resulted in a Joint Venture project being formalised between Range and Africa Oil which saw the formal signing of the Production Sharing Agreement between Range, Africa Oil and the Puntland Government take place on 17 January 2007. Just one of the two blocks - the southern basin - is purported to contain between 2.2 billion and 10.4 billion boe (barrels of oil equivalent), and there is every reason to believe the northern basin offers similar prospects. Range was recently given the go-ahead by the Puntland administration, with the drilling of the first exploration well by Africa Oil scheduled for mid 2010. Range is free carried until Africa Oil has spent the $50 million earmarked for exploration.

Africa Oil recently completed a comprehensive interpretation of newly acquired 2D seismic data over the Dharoor Block, and has identified "several large prospects". Africa Oil and its joint venture partners have agreed to initially drill one prospect in Dharoor, with the well expected to commence drilling before the end of 2010. The company has also completed a re-interpretation of the existing 2D seismic data over the Nugaal Block, having also identified "several large prospects". Africa Oil and its joint venture partners are in discussion regarding drilling plans for 2010-2011.
Click for Full Charting facilities from ShareCrazy.com

The second most exciting feature in Range's portfolio is its 50% farm-in of two onshore oil and gas licenses covering about 7,000 square kilometres (roughly 10% of the country's total surface area) in the Republic of Georgia. Although the project is at a less advanced stage of development than Puntland, the acreage was heavily drilled during soviet era and initial analysis has identified 14 well locations suitable for oil in place estimates. Georgia represents an exciting investment for the company. The country was named "the year's number 1 reformer" in the World bank's 2007 Doing Business Survey. Three major pipelines crossing the country make Georgia an important strategic crossroad for hydrocarbon transit in the Caspian Region. Indeed, one pipeline runs just south of the firm's blocks. In addition to the oil targets there are also numerous prospective gas fields, which include highly prospective natural gas and coal bed methane targets. Early production revenues could be achieved through supplying the nearby city of Kutaisi (the second biggest city in Georgia).

The seismic acquisition program across the License Blocks VIa and VIb was recently completed and signed off by the company's Georgian Partner, Strait Oil and Gas. The seismic programme was acquired using the vibroseis technique and in total 410 km of 2D seismic data were recorded. From the onset the character of the data observed in the QC brute stacks was "good to very good and remained so throughout the programme". The company must now decide whether to progress the targets at the current 50:50 equity basis with its partner or to look for a new farm-in partner.
*The value of investments can go down as well as up. Investing in equities can lose you part or all of your capital. Smaller company shares can be relatively illiquid and thus hard to trade. And that makes such investments more of a high risk than larger company shares. UK-Analyst.com is owned by t1ps.com Ltd which is authorised and regulated by the FSA and can be contacted at 5-11 Worship Street, London EC2A 2BH or on 020 7562 3370.

However, it is the firm's near-term production prospects in Texas that have been providing the bulk of the newsflow of late. Range made the important transition from explorer to producer, less than three months after its confirmation of a commercial discovery at the North Chapman Ranch field. An independent reserves report put gross recoverable reserves at an estimated 215 billion cubic feet of gas (Range: 45Bcf), with a further 15.9 million barrels of oil (Range: 3.3 million barrels). Whilst the majority of these reserves are in the P3 or 'Possible' category, the upcoming multi-well programme should help move this into the 'Probable' (P2) and 'Proved' (P1) categories. From an investment of a mere $1.8 million, net undiscounted cashflow value to Range could be worth as much as $226 million in a 'best case' scenario. Obviously, net present value will be significantly lower given the undiscounted natur e of this estimate, but we are still looking at significant value for shareholders. It is looking increasingly likely that North Chapman alone will be enough to justify the current share price, with the high-impact exploration upside from Puntland and Georgia thrown in for free.

Last week's announcement of a placing to raise $10 million points to further development and diversification of what is becoming an increasingly exciting portfolio. Buy









.
 
Last edited:
is anyone else holding NPE today?

Looks like our boats come in :D Encore and NPE should rocket tomorrow, fingers crossed.

From the Sunday Times this morning ...

North Sea find may be the biggest in a decade
Encore is poised to unveil an oil discovery off the east coast of Scotland which could hold as much as 800m barrels
Danny Forston Published: 27 June 2010North Sea oil could be about to witness a resurgence after Encore's new discovery (AFP/Getty) A group of British companies has made what could be the largest North Sea oil field discovery in nearly a decade.

Encore Oil, a London-listed explorer that led the drilling operation, is expected to tell the market this week that its Catcher prospect, off the east coast of Scotland, holds up to 300m barrels of oil, about 150m of which is extractable. Based on Friday’s oil price of $76.66 a barrel, that would be worth $11.4 billion.

According to industry sources, the company and its partners now plan to drill another two to three wells on neighbouring geological structures. This will determine whether the discoveries are part of a single petroleum system that could hold up to 800m barrels. The company declined to comment.

Even without further drilling, Catcher is among the largest discoveries since the billion-barrel Buzzard reservoir, 60 miles off the Aberdeen coast, in 2001.

Buzzard was discovered by the same management team that have found the new field. They later sold the company they ran, called Encana, and then set up Encore.

The news will give a fillip to ministers, who are desperate to lure companies back to the declining North Sea basin.

Encore’s shares doubled this month after an initial well on Catcher found a 100m-barrel reservoir. It and its partners in the field — Premier Oil, Wintershall, Nautical Petroleum and Agora Oil & Gas, a private firm backed by Lord Rothschild — then drilled sideways, finding the new deposits in the Catcher East well.

The discovery could provide a fillip to government efforts to revive interest in North Sea exploration, where production has been falling since its peak in 1999.

Last year the region yielded 2.5m barrels a day, about 3% of global demand. Big oil producers have begun reducing their stakes there as they turn their attention to more promising areas, such as West Africa, Brazil and Australia.

Several North Sea oil field auctions over the past year have failed for lack of interest and the industry has called for tax breaks to attract new developers.

Premier is the majority owner of the well, with a 35% stake, but Encore is the lead operator.
 
Sounds good news for British tax revenues and the trade balance also
http://www.google.co.uk/finance?q=LON:npe


For anyone who wants to show off their share picking skills, there is a monthly league table for July taking enteries now. Winners prize is 4 months free brokerage reports

http://stockchallenge.co.uk/site/forms/subform.php



I like this article by motley about options on investment trusts. http://www.fool.co.uk/news/investin...12/14/a-perfect-investment-for-optimists.aspx

If a big hit to risk sentiment occurs as has often happened recently I'd consider getting some as 2014 is plenty of time for a rebound (sometimes the stock market is short sighted)
Seems ordinary brokers deal them which isnt true of fancy covered warrants, etc
 
Damnit, missed the sell at 209p, managed to slice off at 180p though :\.

Went back in again with what I originally invested though. Bring on the next appraisal :)
 
Read in news today that BP have secured a lease for drilling in libyan waters and their share price so rising today(that must a be a first for a while). Some people are sure to make some money out of BP.
 
RKH has been having a cracking couple of days, DES not doing to bad either, wiping out most of the loses over the last couple of weeks.
 
Back
Top Bottom