They aren't exactly renown for being by the seat of your pants exciting or having good steering.
I've flushed fish down the toilet that where more alive than some of the steering systems I've found in Gerrman cars
Turbos
- Thread starter ubersonic
- Start date
They aren't exactly renown for being by the seat of your pants exciting or having good steering.
I've flushed fish down the toilet that where more alive than some of the steering systems I've found in Gerrman cars
![[TW]Fox](/data/man-of-honor/2009.png){kind=avatar}
You have got to be joking? Here is a 2001/2 example of each:
The NSX looks like... some cheap big Jap coupe. The 996 looks like... a supercar.
Oh I thought by barge you meant the decent proper wheel drive stuff, not a Golf with a flash badge.
A C4S looks the same just without the vent, tbh.
Im glad your here to tell me these things, because i can't tell, as there all the same.
That Porsche looks about as inviting for me as 20 stone fat smell bird.
Soldato
- Joined
- 19 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 18,085
- Location
- Shakespeare’s County
Yet it's an all aluminium monocoque. Depends what you're after. Unfortunatlet after cracking the chassis and engine they didn't get the interior right.
This is all getting a bit pathetic to discredit one guy.
This is all getting a bit pathetic to discredit one guy.
Well obviously, but wid so likkle torque, i shouldn't be as fast as cars wid more torques?
So if a Turbo Deisel revved 2k more than standard, according to mike it would be rapid.
So BHP and power to weight have nothing to with it then? Okie doke great.
better tell Ariel, that there Atom is slow cus it doesn't have much torque, cus it uses a crappy Honda engine.
Seriously, get a clue - I've even tried explaining it to you already.
HP = Torque * RPM / 5252.
Therefore you cannot have HP without Torque or RPM. If a Turbo Diesel revved to 8200 RPM (that is around 3k RPM more than a normal revs, btw) and could make the same torque at that RPM then it would **** all over your Honda. But RPM isn't a strong point of Diesels, which is why you rarely see super fast ones.
0 Torque * 8200 RPM / 5252 = 0 HP
[TW]Fox;17561805 said:
All im saying is thats the best of the bunch but even a base model with a clear lens kit still looks well, in and out, im one of those that thought the 996 had a good interior, 993's they had a scattered mess, but i think a 996 still looks good inside now.
Please stop posting complete sense, my head might explode.
Soldato
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 8,305
- Location
- The Land of Roundabouts
[TW]Fox;17561790 said:
I dont think exclusivity has anything to do with looks at all, really.
Are you really saying that if Pagani had a bumper year and sold 100,000 Zonda's it would no longer look like a supercar?
Nah the NSX is rubbish like Fox said, everyone from Gordan Murray to Senna is full of crap.
Whats the 911 in bad boys? I wouldn't mind that one, at a push lol.
I did?