No, what they're saying is that a UHP tyre at 1.6mm can perform better than a brand new tyre of a lesser quality. Just read what I've written before you start disputing points because I'm pretty confident that if you slow down and take the time to actually read what I've said, it's more or less exactly as Michelin have said.
They're saying it's wasteful and *unnecessary* to replace tyres at 3mm and that tyre performance in wet or aquaplane conditions is more than just about tread depths. They're comparing premium tyres with lesser performance ones because millions of people a year take off their high quality Michelin/Goodyear/Conti tyres that the car came with from factory, some at 3mm, and replace them with China's finest. That's why it's relevant.
Also by changing tyres early, you're losing out on increased dry braking performance (a worn tyre performs better in the dry than a brand new tyre) and if you're in southern England where you're driving on dry roads 75% of the time, this is a consideration also
They're saying it's wasteful and *unnecessary* to replace tyres at 3mm and that tyre performance in wet or aquaplane conditions is more than just about tread depths. They're comparing premium tyres with lesser performance ones because millions of people a year take off their high quality Michelin/Goodyear/Conti tyres that the car came with from factory, some at 3mm, and replace them with China's finest. That's why it's relevant.
Also by changing tyres early, you're losing out on increased dry braking performance (a worn tyre performs better in the dry than a brand new tyre) and if you're in southern England where you're driving on dry roads 75% of the time, this is a consideration also
